The Formation of Groups & Teams

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By whitesider
Words 3785
Pages 16
Running head: Rapfael Whiteside, THE FORMATION OF GROUPS & TEAMS

The Formation of Groups & Teams
Rapfael Whiteside
Embry Riddle Aeronautical University
MGMT 317 Organizational Behavior 01 December 2010

In this paper I will explain how and why teams and groups are formed, the different types of groups and effectiveness of work groups. The process of a group activity is the interaction and mutual influence among group members as they complete the group activity, communication, leadership, conflict, conflict resolutions and norms of behavior in the group. A group is two or more people who interact with each other to achieve certain goals or needs. The purpose is to accomplish the same goal using my skills, personalities, abilities and experiences to be more effective. “Group forming is a process and there are five stages for group development: forming, storming, norming, performing and adjourning.” (Hunter, Dale, Bailey, Anne, Taylor, Bill, 1995). Some characteristics of work groups that influence or affect the way members behave in the area of group performance can include the group size, group composition, group function, group status, group efficacy and social facilitation. Groups control their members with roles and rules. Role is the division of work among the group members. Rules are made to control group behavior. Work groups establish goals to achieve, using all members’ skills, abilities and experiences. I intend to explain about process loss and process gain. This includes the characteristics that contribute process gain and sources that influence process loss. For example, small groups are considered to be process gain, because it’s a small group, they have better communication and it’s easy to get to know each other better.…...

Similar Documents

Groups and Teams

...Groups and Teams James W. O'Sullivan MGT/307 Monday March 28, 2011 Dina Johnson-Cobb Groups and Teams “A group is defined as two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular objectives” (Organizational Behavior, by Robbins and Judge, p. 284, 2009). Different skills of a diverse workforce are an advantage for success of groups and teams within any organization. Promoting a diverse work environment offers group and team members the opportunity to make evident their skills and ideas. These human resources demonstrate creativity, strategies, and a competitive edge over companies of lesser dimensions. Diversity is a valuable resource provided by group and team members of organizations in today’s competitive market. “Work teams ideally operate to maximize flexibility, creativity, and productivity in a business environment. Frustrating this effort, however, is the increasing level of diversity found in the American workplace, which often heightens the difficulty of getting people to work together effectively. The authors argue that organizations must learn to understand and adjust to workplace diversity, because many of the specific assets and liabilities of work teams arise directly out of the diverse talents and perspectives of teams' individual members” (Diversity in Work Teams: Research Paradigms for a Changing Workplace, by Susan E. Jackson and Marian N. Ruderman, p. 271, 1999). Diversity in the workplace......

Words: 761 - Pages: 4

Groups and Teams

...Groups and Teams All for One and One for All Alexander Dumas in his book The Three Musketeers wrote (1844) “All for One and One for All”. This philosophy is what high performance teams are all about. Is it better to belong to a group or a team? Groups or teams can evolve into high performing, extremely effective, useful tools in any organization if developed and managed correctly. Working as a Team What is the importance of working together in groups and teams? A team or group is two or more people working together to achieve a common goal. An increasing body of literature distinguishes between groups and teams suggesting that teams are more effective than groups. Katzenbach and smith (1993) provided a clear distinction between work groups and teams. A work group is a collection of people working in the same area or placed together to complete a task. The group’s performance is the result of people coming together to share information, views and insight. The focus of groups is individual performance and actions within are geared toward it. All teams are groups, but teams are a special subset of groups. They establish a working definition. A team is a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, set of performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutual accountability where groups do not. The Differences Between Groups and Teams It is helpful to identify the......

Words: 846 - Pages: 4

Groups and Teams

...Groups and Teams Jeannine Helmig MGT307 Diane Roberts University of Phoenix May 10, 2010 In today’s environment organizations have the employees either works together as group or as team to complete assignments or jobs. There are differences between a group and a team and there are also similarities. What the differences are can determine how an organization wants the employees to work together. Below is an explanation of what a group and a team are and what the differences are between a group and team. “A group involves two or more people working together regularly to achieve common goals (Schermerhorn, Hunt, & Osborn, 2008).” “In the group members are mutually dependent on each other to reach the goals set forth and to communicate regularly to meet the goals over a period of time (Schermerhorn, Hunt, & Osborn, 2008).” There are different types of groups, the effective groups, formal groups, and informal groups. “Effective groups strive to achieve high levels of performance, satisfaction, and viability with meeting goals (Schermerhorn, Hunt, & Osborn, 2008).” Formal groups are groups which have been designated for specific organizational purposes. An example is a manager is the head of the group and one or more people reporting directly to the manager. “Informal groups are groups which are formed to serve special interests such as people which take lunch together and may work together (Schermerhorn, Hunt, & Osborn, 2008).” No......

Words: 860 - Pages: 4

Groups and Teams

...Groups and Teams Teams and Groups This paper will explain the differences between a group and a team as well as the importance of workplace diversity in an organization and how it relates to team dynamics in the workplace. The importance of groups and teams within the workplace is essential to understand the meaning of both terms. Groups Groups is a collection of individuals who have regular contact and frequent interaction, mutual influence, common feelings of camaraderie, and who work together to achieve a common set of goals (Business Dictionary.com, 2010). Forming a group based on surrounding personalities and behavior is not difficult, although the effectiveness of groups may vary. A group's interpersonal dynamics can range from compatibility to intolerance, which could make consensus building difficult for leadership. In-group there is separate characteristics of every individual working with the group. This means every individual has his or her own job to perform. Teams Teams are a group of people with a full set of complementary skills required to complete a task, job, or project (Business Dictionary.com, 2010). Team members operate with a high degree of interdependence, share authority and responsibility for self-management, are accountable for collective performance, and work toward a common goal and shared reward (Business Dictionary.com, 2010). A team offers skills that are advantages...

Words: 601 - Pages: 3

Group and Teams

...Groups and Teams Paper The future world of management is relying on Groups and Teams, who can function in a business setting for productive success. However, if using the managing skills correctly Teams and Groups may evolve into an effective high performing organization. The effort of writing this paper is to enlighten readers on the difference between Groups and Teams dynamical functioning. Nevertheless, with the provision of exclusive examination this paper will further bring out the importance of workplace diversity in an organizational environment; and team dynamics in the workplace. The most effective way to help readers understand the difference between Groups and Teams begins with defining the two organizations for clarity. The definition of a” Group is a small group of people with complementary skills in which a leader’s goal and approach; and are willing to be held accountable by the leader” (Mackin, 2007). Groups attainments are approached by the leader’s goals for dominate support. The accountability of a group is thrives on individual accountability. However, the viewpoints of leaders are for the production of its organization the supervisor has input. Subsequently group decisions are made by voting rather than members acquiring any input. However, “a team is a small group of people with complementary skills and abilities with common goals and approaches for which they hold each other accountable” (Mackin, 2007). Teams require structure and support, aside......

Words: 734 - Pages: 3

Groups and Teams

...Running head: Groups and Teams Groups and Teams Tracey Zenaye MGT307 November 8, 2010 Dan Daily Groups and Teams Groups and teams are two terms frequently used interchangeably. Both terms are utilized in the corporate world and within individuals’ personal lives. Although a group and a team are closely related there are notable differences between the two. This paper will discuss the differences between groups and teams, the importance of diversity in an organization, and how diversity relates to team dynamics in the workplace. Groups and Teams Webster’s Dictionary defines groups as a small unit of three to 15 people. A team is a cooperative unit or group of people lined in a common purpose. Groups and teams are formed for one central purpose, which is to achieve a goal. The strength of a team relies on the fact that the members of a team have similarities in their purpose and there is interconnectivity between the individual members and the group is larger in number and the group’s strength could be assessed from the fact that they need to be willing to execute the commands of a leader (Articlesbase, 2008). Forming a group is fairly simple. For instance, if there was a room filled with lawyers, doctors, and police officers, it would be a simple task to form groups according to common traits. Groups can be formed based on experience, gender, and age, or other common factors. In a group, members have a......

Words: 717 - Pages: 3

Team and Groups

...Groups and Teams Before taking this course the student always thought groups and teams were the same, but she has realized even though, these two terms do have some similarities they also have some differences. In this paper the student will explain the differences between groups and teams, examine the importance of workplace diversity in an organization, and how it relates to team dynamics in the workplace. A work group is a collection of people working in similar areas and placed together to complete a task. Groups performance is the outcome of people coming together to share information views and insights. Members of groups have a mutual purpose. As members gather together, each brings a different personal perspective and style to the table. As the members share information, they begin the decision-making processes that help each member perform his or her particular responsibility. The two main types of groups are formal groups and informal groups. A formal group is designed around an organizations formal structure. An informal group is not structured and is normally formed out of a social need (Schermerhorn Jr, Hunt, & Osborn, 2008). (Good ) Teams are groups, but teams are a distinct separation of groups. A team is a reduced number of people with corresponding skills and committed to a common purpose, a set of performance goals and an approach for which they hold themselves accountable. (Good) Teams start out as groups; (Always???) they share some of the same beginning...

Words: 578 - Pages: 3

Groups & Teams

...Groups and Teams An explanation of the difference between a group and a team will be addressed. By definition groups and teams are not the same thing. Workplace diversity has an important role in an organization. Diversity covers areas beyond race and gender. Diversity can affects the dynamics of a team in positive and negative ways. [A group is defined as two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular objectives] (Robbins & Judge, 2009). A group with two members is a dyad; one with three is a triad. There a two types of groups formal and informal. Formal groups are defined by the structure of the organization with selected responsibilities create jobs. The behaviors of a formal group are usually aimed at achieving the organization’s objectives. Groups that are formed by natural agreement that have no structure are informal. Informal groups are formed in response to a social need. The two main groups can be divided farther. Formal groups have command and task groups. Informal groups have interest and friendship groups. An organizational chart determines the command group. Command groups are made up of people who report a specific manager. People working with each other to finish a job are a task group. This group is not limited to a specific manager, and can include people from any area of the organization. Interest groups band together to achieve a certain goal that is in their common interest. An individual does......

Words: 793 - Pages: 4

Prison and Group Formation

...Theory of Group Formation Money, narcotics, and protection, what more could a prisoner ask for? If that question is ever solved then the answer to the prison gang epidemic may be found. Prison gangs, by nature, are a group just like any other, and thus go through the same group formation process as any other group. A key part of this process is adjourning, the stage where group members are satisfied with the group and leave. However, the adjourning stage hasn’t occurred as much in prison gangs as people would like. By showing that prison gangs go through the rest of the stages of group formation, it will be shown that they could go through the final stage of adjourning. Tuckman’s Group Formation Theory Bruce Tuckman first created his group formation theory in 1965 after studying 50 articles on the topic of group formation. He extrapolated from those 50 articles a general concept for group formation. This concept of group formation recognizes that every group has a task that it must complete, and interpersonal relationships between the group members (Tuckman 1965). This concept originally stated that the group goes through four different stages of dealing with the task and interpersonal relationships: forming, storming, norming, and performing (Tuckman 1965). A fifth category, adjourning, was added in 1977 (Tuckman and Jensen). Forming is the stage in which group members test the boundaries of both the interpersonal relationships of the group and of the group task......

Words: 2737 - Pages: 11

Groups and Teams

...Groups and Teams Brandon Stewart MGT 307 July 14, 2011 Janel Carr Groups and Teams A group and a team may sound the same but in many ways are very different. The reason individuals interact with one another from a group to a team are unique. Diversity inside the workplace can affect the dynamics of a group or team in positive and negative ways. Achieving high levels of job performance, member satisfaction, and team capability is the definition of an effective team or group. Groups A groups is two or more individuals, interacting and interdependent, who have come together to achieve particular objectives (Robbins & Judge, 2009). A work group is a group that interacts primarily to share information and to make decisions to help each group member perform within his or her area of responsibility (Robbins & Judge, 2009). A work group does not assign the same job responsibilities to multiple members. Teams A work team is two or more individuals who individual efforts result in performance greater than the sum of the individual inputs (Robbins & Judge, 2009). A work team assigns multiple members to the same job responsibility. A work team creates positive synergy through a synchronized effort (Robbins & Judge, 2009). Differences The goal for a group is the share information. The goal for a team is their collective performance. The synergy for a group is neutral. The synergy for a team is positive. The accountability inside a group is on......

Words: 642 - Pages: 3

Groups and Teams

...Groups and Teams Brittany Butler MGT/307 June 20, 2011 John Anderson Groups and teams are made up of individuals who come together for a specific objective or interest. They can do a variety of things including meeting for coffee, making products, listening to music, provide services, make choices, negotiate deals, or coordinate projects to reach a common goal or task. Some of the reasons for the joining of groups and teams are related to responsibility within an organization, and some are related only to personal interest. The makings of a group or team can be diverse, which may lead to conflict or creativity depending on the collaboration. Groups A group consists of two or more individuals who come together to work on a common goal. The different kinds of groups include informal groups, formal groups, command groups, task groups, interest groups, and friendship groups. Groups are either formal or informal and from there can be classified further into the other types. Formal groups are “defined by the organization’s structure, with designated work assignments establishing tasks” (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p. 284). In this type of group the actions of the individuals are directed toward achieving the goals of the organization. Informal groups “on the other hand” are not established or structured around an organization. These groups are naturally forming groups that form from individuals who meet socially in the work environment. It is said that members of...

Words: 922 - Pages: 4

Groups and Teams

...Groups and Teams Kit Sumpter MGT/307 May 2, 2011 Randall Voss Groups and Teams Each and every individual is important to their company and every company delegates different individuals to different tasks, groups, or teams. Many people do not emphasize the difference between a group and a team; in fact they often do not think about it or even realize that there is one but in business there is a great difference. The following pages will go into more detail to explain the differences and their importance and how workplace diversity plays a key role in teamwork within the workplace. There is no doubt that more often than not, an objective is more easily reached if there is more than one individual is working towards it. According to Schermerhorn, Hunt, and Osborn ( 2008), “A group is a collection og two or more people who work with one another regularly to achieve common goals.” In essence you could say that the entire company is a group. They don’t necessarily all work on the project of the company itself (for example the janitor), but they all work within the group to ensure the process runs as smooth as possible and each member is important to the whole. A group does not always pertain to a company though; it can be reading groups or even a non-profit organization such as those for the disabled. The latter is considered a formal group (Schermerhorn et al., 2008). “A team is a small group of people with complementary skills who work actively together...

Words: 723 - Pages: 3

Team Formation Exercise

...15315 PROJECT MANAGEMENT Principles Team Formation Exercise PART B: BELBIN’S Teamwork Self-Perception Inventory For each section, distribute a total of ten points among the sentences which you think best describe your behaviour. These points may be distributed among several sentences: in extreme cases they might be spread among all the sentences or ten points may be given to a single sentence. Enter the points in the Self Perception Inventory: Points Table at the end of the document. 1 What I believe I can contribute to a team: a) I think I can quickly see and take advantage of new opportunities. b) I can work well with a very wide range of people. c) Producing ideas is one of my natural assets. d) My ability rests in being able to draw people out whenever I detect they have something of value to contribute to group objectives. e) My capacity to follow through has much to do with my personal effectiveness. f) I am ready to face temporary unpopularity if it leads to worthwhile results in the end. g) I am quick to sense what is likely to work in a situation with which I am familiar. h) I can offer a reasoned case for alternative courses of action without introducing bias or prejudice. 2. If I have a possible shortcoming in teamwork, it could be that: a) I am not at ease unless meetings are well structured and controlled and generally well conducted. b) I am inclined to be too generous towards others who have a valid viewpoint that has not been given...

Words: 1324 - Pages: 6

Groups & Teams

...Underlying Groups and Teams................................................................ 3 Gibson, Ivancevich, Donnelly, Konopaske.......................................................3 Groups............................................................................................................... 3 Teams................................................................................................................ 4 2.1.1 2.1.2 2.2 Stephen P. Robbins.........................................................................................4 Groups............................................................................................................... 4 Teams................................................................................................................ 5 2.2.1 2.2.2 2.3 Jones, George, Hill ..........................................................................................7 Groups, Teams and Organisational Effectiveness............................................. 7 Groups and Teams as Performance Enhancers................................................ 7 2.3.1 2.3.2 3. 3.1 3.2 3.3 4. 4.1 4.2 Is this a Mature Work Group or Team?....................................................................... 8 Stages of Group Development ........................................................................8 The Five-Stage Model .....................................................................................9 Syndicate Group......

Words: 5428 - Pages: 22

Groups and Team

...Groups and Teams Your Name MGT307 Date Instructor Groups and Teams The terms group and team are often used interchangeably, although the two terms represent distinctly different functions. Both groups and teams are used in many organizations to achieve organizational goals and further production. Workplace diversity is an important aspect of an organization, and helps to promote effective team dynamics. Groups and team can work together to achieve organizational success. Groups and teams are similar yet very different from each other. Within an organization groups are often referred to as departments. Examples of departmental groups can include accounting departments, graphic design departments, installation departments, and project management departments. Groups consists of several employees who interact primarily to share best practices, information, perspectives, and make decisions to help each group member perform individual tasks (Executive Evolution, 2004). Groups are focused on accomplishing a particular task or goal such as the accounting department being responsible for an organization´s accounts payable and accounts receivable functions. Group members report to a specific leader, often known as a manager or supervisor, of the department or group. The group leader assigns individual tasks to members of the group, holding each group member responsible for specific functions. Accountability within a group is not shared as in a team environment; instead each......

Words: 879 - Pages: 4

Running Man Episode 190 | Prix les moins chers | Watch Trailer