Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson

In: Business and Management

Submitted By crystalsix06
Words 1007
Pages 5
Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson

Jessie Bruswick

July 18, 2014

Introduction
What are the key components that keep a business or company afloat? Most business owners and CEOs would suggest a business plan, budget, qualified and experienced workers, goals for the business, great leadership, and maybe even trial and error. All of these suggestions are sure contributions to the success of any business, but we must not forget prioritizing. This case study will help us to see and understand that D. D. Williamson Company made prioritizing very crucial and necessary in the building, growth, and success of the company. Many companies have all the previously mentioned attributes, but without having a since of priority, the company will soon fail. After realizing some failed projects, D.D. Williamson began taking a closer look at what was really important. Prioritizing allows companies like D.D. Williamson, the opportunity to step back and see what’s important, very important, and least important. With that knowledge, the company can take its best managers or leaders and put them on projects that require more attention, skill, and knowledge, while other sub-projects can be seen after by others with not as much experience.
Literature Review
Critique the prioritizing process The process previously used by D. D. Williamson Company in 2004, caused a weakness that was two-fold. The company had too many projects that were considered as high importance and the projects they had that were active were often late, over budget, and not achieving the predicted results (human resource project management). This was causing the company to lose out big time by leaving opportunities for growth and profitability on the table. From 2004-2009 (5 years), the company realized that more changes needed to be made with prioritization as the main determining factor of the…...

Similar Documents

Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson

...Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson Dianne M. Dowling Human Resource Project Management Strayer University Dr. Lila Jordan April 26, 2013 Abstract D. D. Williams was founded in 1865 and today is a global leader of non-artificial coloring. They operate in nine (9) facilities in six (6) countries and supplies many of the best-know food and beverage companies. Though time has brought about many changes, the organization finally realized what needed to transpire in order to bring their mission and vision into becoming the outstanding company they are today. With strategic planning and prioritizing, D. D. Williamson has learned what it takes to be successful and what brings positive results (Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler& McAfee, 2012). Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson Prioritizing is the process of translating strategic objectives into operational priorities. It involves deciding which projects or types of projects to do and which not to do. Through prioritizing agencies direct resources, time and energy to projects that are deemed more important and lucrative in achieving the objective of the organization success (Mintzberg, 1994). Strategic planning is an organizational activity that is used to set priorities, focus energy and resources, strengthen operations and ensures that employees and other shareholders are working toward common goals. It is a disciplined effort that produces decisions and actions that......

Words: 1297 - Pages: 6

Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson

...Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson HRM 517 – Managing Human Resource projects Strayer University June 21, 2013 What was the Prioritization Issue at D.D. Williamson? In the case study of D.D. Williamson, it appeared the organization was successful in many ventures, but lacked the ability to manage certain projects. In fact, critical projects that required attention were left to the waste side, and as a result lead to missed opportunities, or resulted in going over the allocated budget. Within the organization of D.D. Williamson, there appeared to have been a breakdown in communication, which blinded the organization in determining projects that needed the most attention. Through the process of the organization’s investigation, which took approximately three years, leaders realized the they had no accurate system in place for marking the level of importance in each of their projects. In researching the writings of Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, and McAffee (2012), D.D. Williamson would have benefited from utilizing a project management team, whom would have identified the scope of the project, cost, and taken ownership of the schedule from start to finish. D.D. Williamson would have benefited from having developed a well-rounded project team, or several teams could have managed each project independently. Furthermore, each team could have managed the project based on the urgency of each project, the cost, and the practical details......

Words: 1197 - Pages: 5

Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson

...Case Study 1: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson Crystal D. Dr. Donny Bagwell Managing Human Resources Projects: HRM 517 October 27, 2013 Introduction D.D. Williamson implemented a new process for project prioritization that included focusing on the vision and impact of projects and narrowing down projects by selecting the ones of high importance and assigning them to senior management teams. I will attempt to critique that process, recommend an improvement for the process, provide a scenario of why the process could possibly not be successful, and project if the process will still be successful in five years. Critiquing D.D. Williamson Project Prioritization The prioritization process at D. D. Williamson is a great improvement opposed to the previous prioritization process that was implemented. I believe that D.D. Williamson was able to finally overcome challenges after years of not having a successful process in place. Cutting down the amount of projects from 60 to 16 was a smart plan that in return helped D.D. Williamson not to go over budget, increase the success rate to over 60 percent of projects finishing close to the expected completion date, and earn better results. This process also helped to move forward the most critical projects of high importance. Simplifying the criteria ratings also helped to narrow down projects and prioritize them. By selecting a new criteria rating and focusing on the Vision Impact Projects (VIPs), it......

Words: 809 - Pages: 4

Prioritizing D.D. Williamson

...1. Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. D.D. Williamson (Williamson) is the world leader in caramel coloring and natural coloring for foods and beverages with global operations on five continents since founded in 1865. Over the years, the company has managed to be successful in many business endeavors, as well as withstanding the test of time by being in existence almost 150 years (DDW, 2013). In this time, Williamson has experienced many difficulties but yet has managed to overcome them all and their problem with prioritizing was no different. In this case study, Williamson had trouble managing projects that were successful, so they took a step back and pinpointed the cause of this issue. They found the cause to be the lack of project prioritization. There were projects of great importance being pushed to the side while meaningless project were being started. As a result of this, projects were gone over budget and there were probability many missed opportunities due to their disorganization. So they took time to devise a plan that would help them better select the projects that were more useful to the organization. The process took about three years to settle on a strategy that would bring success to their critical projects. With management being one of the essential tools needed for project management, Williamson’s first approach was where senior management worked together to select a maximum of two projects per senior sponsor by a set of criteria and......

Words: 1013 - Pages: 5

D.D. Williams

...qwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbnm Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson HRM 517 Managing Human Resource Projects 1/26/2014 Dawn Vousboukis Dr. Castellese | Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson The “Vision Impact Project” (Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, & McAfee, 2012) took three years to set up and had to be done twice. If this had been done correctly from the beginning, it could have helped prioritize the project for the company. Project charters can and will help the process of a project, if they are not used problems will follow. When deciding to use a charter it is important to consider that the, “Truth is that if they start to consider creating a charter as a best practice, many problems or issues can be eliminated.” (Karim, 2012) D.D. Williams started out with too many projects on the agenda, because of this, there were projects that did not get finished that could have been to the company’s benefit. If a Project charter is not used or completed correctly, there are issues that may occur for example, a “director or executive who said they would fund a project from their budget didn’t come through. The project charter should clearly state who is responsible for funding, and they need to sign it” (Tangco.R, 2013) The reason that the projects that were most important did not get completed comes down to them not being prioritized correctly in order of importance, and were overlooked due to the amount of projects going on at the same......

Words: 984 - Pages: 4

Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson

...Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson 2014 October 20 HRM 517/ Professor Stephen Castellese Prioritizing Projects 1 Introduction Keeping any organization above water takes a few key components. These components are not limited to strategic planning, goals, budgeting, qualifications, leadership and loyalty. These components will make for a successful organization as long as they remember to prioritize. A case study has been conducted on the business of D.D. Williamson. The D.D. Williamson Company has not been one to lack success, but has lacked the ability to manage projects. Because of its lacking ability to manage projects they have missed out on opportunities and have exceeded budgets. After reading the case study we see that there has also been a clear breakdown in the communication when dealing with projects assignments. It took nearly three years before investigating and upper level management to figure out that there were no precise systems put into place for marking projects level of importance. Prioritizing is necessary and crucial to an organization for growth, planning, and success. According to Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, and McAffee (2012), D.D. Williamson would have benefited from utilizing a project management team, whom would have identified the scope of the project, cost, and taken ownership of the schedule from start to finish. Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. This company would have benefited......

Words: 1041 - Pages: 5

Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson

...Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson Critique the prioritizing process D. D. Williamson. D. D. Williamson is a small privately held company. Founded in 1865 in Louisville, Kentucky, D. D. Williamson has become a global leader in non-artificial colors (Kloppenberg & Nkomo, 2012). The company has grown to nine operating facilities in six countries and supplying many food and beverage companies around the world. D. D. Williamson had too many projects that were all deemed important. Even though the project was ongoing, some projects were late, over budget, and not achieving the predicted results (Kloppenberg & Nkomo, 2012). With so many active and important projects, the company decided to implement a prioritization matrix. The prioritization matrix was an excellent way to prioritize the company’s projects and improve the budget and on-time rates. As of 2009, the company made more changes to their prioritization process. They decided to choose no more than five “Vision Impact Projects” that would get high-level focus and attention (Kloppenberg & Nkomo, 2012). Projects are now receiving more in depth attention. Suggest at least one recommendation to improve the prioritizing process. Although D. D. Williamson has an effective prioritizing process, any method can be improved. The first thing D. D. Williams can do to improve the prioritizing process. Knowing that whatever process that is done the greatest impact will be on the stakeholder......

Words: 771 - Pages: 4

Hrm517 Week 3 Case Study 1 Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2) Hrm 517 Week 3 Case Study 1 Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2)

...Resource Management and Project Life Cycle" Please respond to the following: Explain the elements of project management and its relationship to human resource management. Evaluate the importance of understanding the various stages of the project life cycle and its possible contributions to a project.   HRM517 Week 2 Discussion "Strategic Planning and Organizational Restructuring" Please respond to the following: Assess the merits of this statement by incorporating a specific personal project, formal or informal. “Strategic planning is critical in the overall effectiveness of project management.” Imagine you are the CEO of a growing international manufacturing organization in need of corporate restructuring. Select an organizational structure, (functional, matrix, or projectized) and assess the influence on project roles and decisions made in both your home country and overseas. HRM517 Week 3 Discussion "Project Charter" Please respond to the following: Dissect the elements of a project charter, explaining the importance of each element. Next, research a minimum of two project charter templates from a variety of source. Then., evaluate the selected project charter templates, and describe what you did or did not like about each. Include the website URL where each template was found. Be sure to discuss what value you think the charter would bring to a project. Imagine your manager is putting pressure on you to get a project started and feels the project charter can be......

Words: 2056 - Pages: 9

Hrm517 Week 3 Case Study 1 Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2) Hrm 517 Week 3 Case Study 1 Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson (Chapter 2)

...Resource Management and Project Life Cycle" Please respond to the following: Explain the elements of project management and its relationship to human resource management. Evaluate the importance of understanding the various stages of the project life cycle and its possible contributions to a project. HRM517 Week 2 Discussion "Strategic Planning and Organizational Restructuring" Please respond to the following: Assess the merits of this statement by incorporating a specific personal project, formal or informal. “Strategic planning is critical in the overall effectiveness of project management.” Imagine you are the CEO of a growing international manufacturing organization in need of corporate restructuring. Select an organizational structure, (functional, matrix, or projectized) and assess the influence on project roles and decisions made in both your home country and overseas. HRM517 Week 3 Discussion "Project Charter" Please respond to the following: Dissect the elements of a project charter, explaining the importance of each element. Next, research a minimum of two project charter templates from a variety of source. Then., evaluate the selected project charter templates, and describe what you did or did not like about each. Include the website URL where each template was found. Be sure to discuss what value you think the charter would bring to a project. Imagine your manager is putting pressure on you to get a project started and feels the project charter can be......

Words: 2038 - Pages: 9

Hrm 517 Week 3 Case Study 1 Prioritizing Projects

...3 CASE STUDY 1 PRIORITIZING PROJECTS To purchase this visit here: http://www.activitymode.com/product/hrm-517-week-3-case-study-1-prioritizing-projects/ Contact us at: SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM HRM 517 WEEK 3 CASE STUDY 1 PRIORITIZING PROJECTS HRM 517 Week 3 Case Study 1 - Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Wil Read the case titled: “Prioritizing Projects at D. D. Williamson” found in Chapter 2. Write a 3-5 page paper in which you: 1. Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. 2. Suggest at least one (1) recommendation to improve the prioritizing process. 3. Create a scenario where the implemented process at D. D. Williamson would not work. 4. Project five (5) years ahead and speculate whether or not D. D. Williamson will be using the same process. Justify your answer. 5. Use at least four (4) resources in this assignment. Your assignment must:  Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.  Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.  Activity mode aims to provide quality study notes and tutorials to the students of HRM 517 Week 3 Case Study 1 Prioritizing Projects in order to......

Words: 255 - Pages: 2

Prioritizing at Dd Williamson

...Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson HRM 517 October 23, 2011 Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson This paper will critique the prioritizing process at D.D. Williamson; suggest one recommendation to improve the prioritizing process, a scenario to discuss where the implemented process at D.D. Williamson would not work, and a long term goal of five years from now speculating whether or not D.D. Williamson will be using the same process. D.D. Williamson has nine natural coloring operations on five continents since founded in 1865. With that said, it took D.D. Williamson three years; two iteration to reconcile on an approach that significantly increased the company success rate with critical projects they now call VIP (Vision Impact Projects) (.Kloppenborg, 2012 p 48) D.D. Williamson began its first approach to prioritize the company senior management team, being that it is the company major management support system. With this, the senior management teams would have a limit of two projects per senior management totaling 16 projects. According to D.D. Williamson, the company thought it was a great move ahead because the year before, the senior management teams had been challenge to monitor over 60 improvement projects (Kloppenborg, 2012, p 48). Although the company improved to well over 60 percent, there were still some problems. Some projects were not moving forward as planned and came to be a critical investment for D.D. Williamson. The company......

Words: 1008 - Pages: 5

Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson

...The 9 Essential Skills of Human Resources Management - How Many Do You Have? Human Resources Management Key Skill #1: Organization Human Resources management requires an orderly approach. Organized files, strong time management skills and personal efficiency are key to the Human Resources function. You’re dealing with people’s lives and careers here, and when a manager requests a personnel file or a compensation recommendation that lines up with both the organization and the industry, it won’t do to say, “Hold on. I’ll see if I can find it.” Human Resources Management Key Skill #2: Multitasking On any day, an HR professional will deal with an employee’s personal issue one minute, a benefit claim the next and a recruiting strategy for a hard-to-fill job the minute after. Priorities and business needs move fast and change fast, and colleague A who needs something doesn’t much care if you’re already helping colleague B. You need to be able to handle it all, all at once. Human Resources Management Key Skill #3: Discretion and Business Ethics Human Resources professionals are the conscience of the company, as well as the keepers of confidential information. As you serve the needs of top management, you also monitor officers’ approaches to employees to ensure proper ethics are observed. You need to be able to push back when they aren’t, to keep the firm on the straight and narrow. Not an easy responsibility! Of course, you always handle appropriately, and never divulge to......

Words: 579 - Pages: 3

Projects

...Assignment One: Prioritizing Projects at D.D. Williamson Angel Harris Dr. Jean Gordon Human Resource Project Management April 18, 2012 Critique the prioritizing process at D. D. Williamson. The prioritizing process at D.D. Williams is not that effective. One of the reasons why is that they have too many projects that requires a lot of immediate attention. How could this company complete projects on time when they have too many that are top priority? Upper management may want to consider hiring more employees so that they are not over their budget or not being able to complete the projects in a timely manner. It would be wise for them to minimize the work load or they are going to create angry employees and consumers. Also, it appears that the company is lacking in the area of been more organized. A learner should agree that being well organized is one of the best strategies to reduce stress and allows the project to run a little more smoothly. However, it appears that the company needs to spend a little more time preparing their project charter because sometimes when it is not very detailed, that could lead to important things being overlooked which may cause the company chaos in the future. Most importantly D.D. Williamson may need to focus a lot on effective leadership. A reader should agree that it takes leaders that have the capability to lead a team so that they can help the company meet and exceed their short-term and......

Words: 844 - Pages: 4

Prioritizing Williams & Williams

...Prioritizing Process at D. D. Williamson Abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyze and review the prioritizing process that D.D. Williamson created in order to better manage their projects and prevent financial loss. D.D. Williamson decided to create this process after they realized that some “critical” projects were not being completed in a timely fashion. In this paper you will also see different sceneries that D.D. Williamson’s new process may not work as well as some additional suggestions to improve their current process. Prioritizing Process of D.D. Williamson The main point of this case study was to review the process that D.D. Williamson created in order to better prioritize their projects so that all projects could be more manageable. According to our text (Kloppenborg, T., Nkomo, S. (2012). Human resource project management. (2nded.) Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning (pg 48) that the reason the first trial of the project didn’t work was because they still had to many projects and “critical” projects were not being completed and were over budget. This caused them to have to re-evaluate the current process and create yet another process. One of the ways that I would have critiqued this project would have been suggesting that everyone review a few different charter templates. They could have used one from a website like Projectmanager.com or they could have used a software like Swiftlight. I think had they......

Words: 780 - Pages: 4

D.D. Williamson

...Critique the prioritizing process at D.D. Williamson D.D. Williamson’s prioritizing process started off not good but once they realized their mistakes they were able to sit down and rethink their prioritizing process. As mentioned, “We took three years and two iterations of our prioritization process to finally settle on an approach that dramatically increased our success rate on critical projects (now called VIPs, or “Vision Impact Projects”). ( Kloppenborg, Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 2012) Even though it took them a minimum of three years they realized their mistakes and were able to overcome their negatives results and turn those results into a negative. Not all projects will be successful or even start off successful, but D.D. Williamson never allowed their unsuccessfulness to prevent them from continuing on with their projects. D.D. Williamson showed enough loyalty to their employees to know that they were overwhelmed on the number of projects they had on the table they “hired a continuous improvement manager to serve as both our project office and a key resource for project facilitation.” ( pg 48) In my opinion, D.D. Williamson showed a high level of professionalism when they brought on additional employees for their company. With that being said they were able to increase their success rate to sixty percent and that was higher than the previous year. Suggest at least one (1) recommendation to improve prioritizing process. hin the 1970s with......

Words: 1229 - Pages: 5

Contact Us | Somewhere I Belong | Watch Now