Polital and Economical Freedom Essay

In: Business and Management

Submitted By ksg1511
Words 1302
Pages 6
Political and Economic freedom is not an easy task to examine but it's not a difficult idea to grasp. What is freedom? Freedom starts with the ability to have self-control. In a free society, everyone has legal control of their mind and body as there is "an equal distribution of legal rights and in which each and every person has as much legal rights as possible" (Hughes). The concept of freedom refers to a certain type of political empowerment such as equal empowerment. Freedom entitles political equality, as it involves as much rights with the same legal rights in others. For example, freedom does not include the legal right to enslave an individual because freedom includes the legal right to not be enslaved. This broad topic of freedom is going to be narrowed into two specific concepts. The two main concepts that are going to be viewed is Political freedom and Economic freedom.

Political Freedom are rights such as the rights to vote, the right of free association and the right of expression that helps individuals determine who the rulers would be and how they will be ruled. Political freedom is best appreciated in countries where those freedoms do not exist or are denied as people have a sense of global awareness. This freedom was prominent in western societies but it amounted to little except how the society will be organized in an order where individuals would be able to pursue their own happiness. This kind of freedom created the prosperity that we as individuals now enjoy. Milton Friedman says, "The preservation of freedom is the protective reason for limiting and decentralising governmental power. But there is also a constructive reason. The great advances of civilisation, whether in architecture, or painting, in science or literature, in industry or agriculture, have never come from centralised government” (Friedman). Freidman does not refer to the…...

Similar Documents

Political and Economical Developments Asia Europe

... Political And Economical Developments Asia Europe [Writer Name] [Institute Name] [Date] international managment In this paper, provide a descriptive title or heading for your paper by focusing on topics or countries that interest you (such as “Political and Economical Developments in the Asian or European Systems”), and then discuss the following concepts: 1) Explain in detail why and how the political systems of countries differ; 2) discuss how the legal systems of countries differ; 3) explain what determines the level of economic development of a nation; 4) discuss with examples the macro-political and economic changes taking place worldwide; and 5) analyze how transition economies are moving towards market based systems. You can use specific continents, countries, or country as your focus. Political And Economical Developments Asia Europe There has been of course many changes since 1989. To understand this we should analyze how the situation before the revolution. Before 1989 there was no political freedom. There were elections, but there was only one candidate, down from the city councils up to the MPs, all of them were nominated by an almighty party. The most powerful man was not president, neither Prime minister, but the leader of the party. He was also responsible to the leader of the party in USSR. There was no freedom of religion; every priest had to be issued a special admission to work as one. The Bishops were nominated, the orders were denied. People were not...

Words: 4916 - Pages: 20

Freedom

...Lillian Haywood Philosophy 3101 December 6, 2012 Freedom In My Opinion The word freedom has little meaning to anyone if we don't have a common definition. Freedom is the state of being free or at liberty rather than in confinement or under physical restraint or the power to determine action without restraint. In my opinion freedom starts with a principle of self-control or self ownership. We have legal control over our body and mind. The concept of freedom refers to a certain type of political empowerment which means, a free society is one with an equal distribution of our legal rights and in which each and every person has as much legal rights as possible. In a free society, one person cannot have so many rights that all other people could not logically have the same amount of legal rights. Can you imagine if the world was like this, there would be more chaos thatn we already have in the world. An example is, freedom doesn't include the legal right to enslave someone else because freedom includes the legal right not to be enslaved. Also, freedom does not include the legal right to non-defensively punch someone in the face against their will because freedom includes the right to not be offensively punched. I believe that's battery and assault in the law enforcement world. The principle of self-control lets us easily realize why freedom includes the legal right to self-defense. Freedom includes self-defense because empowering people with......

Words: 485 - Pages: 2

Freedom Essay

...balance between freedom, equality and solidarity. How much freedom?  How much solidarity?  Why?   Solidarity, freedom and equality are very similar. They only have little distinct between each other, when it is ready further in detail. One strong element is that they all require power. This is the main element that is a huge symbol. Every country has its own sets of rules that need to be followed, so no one can “everyone is treated equally” because they really are not. Each and every human being has the right to freedom of speech, but only to a certain extent. Lastly, solidarity is being faithful, every member of that group is more or likely similar. Now the idea of modern human rights have completely different view than they did before. It was more conservative and it focuses more the socialism. This is a huge step because then freedom, solidarity and equality get a different idea  Freedom: “The power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint”.  [1] Freedom is having the right to do what one desires, as long as no one is being hurt. As well as one may travel, whenever they need to. There are not many restrictions held upon us such as: going to school, chose what one would desire to make a living for.  In a country like Canada, one is allowed to choose his or her identity without being discriminated upon. Freedom is strongly believed through the wants and needs of ours individually. No one has the full capacity to freedom even if they......

Words: 708 - Pages: 3

Freedom

...Freedom People today agree that freedom is a very important and that it should be part of their lives, but what does it mean to have freedom? Some would say it is the ability to do whatever you want as long as you do not break the law or hurt someone else, but others would say it is being able to do whatever you please without having any consequences. Many authors in the past wrote about this topic and what their definition of freedom was. Their writings inspired many people to think what freedom really meant and take action for freedom. A few of these authors were John Winthrop, Benjamin Franklin, and Ralph Emerson. John Winthrop categorized freedom into two categories, Natural Liberty and Civil Liberty. Benjamin Franklin was more interested in the economic side of freedom by being able to choose any job to become financially successful and having to do things for himself. Ralph Emerson’s definition of freedom was for people to think for themselves and do what they think is right. Just to worry about themselves instead of worrying about other people’s opinion and what others are doing. They all had different views of freedom and what it means to be free, but deep down they were similar in which people want the freedom to choose and be who they want to be without being punished or bound. John Winthrop’s definition of Natural Liberty is being able to do whatever people wanted and just relying on their instincts just like an animal would. “By this, man, as he stands in......

Words: 1370 - Pages: 6

Freedom

...Freedom is an essential part of the good life. One cannot be living a good life if he/she is not free to do what he/she wants. However, with freedom comes the moral understanding of what can and cannot be done by the individual. If one is supposed to be living without boundaries then having the boundaries of morality stop unjust acts, this brings to itself what can and cannot be done by the individual. Thus, this brings an overall contradiction to the word freedom. Rousseau wrote, “Man is born free, and yet everywhere he is in chains”. We can distinguish between two types of freedom: 1. Intrinsic freedom, or our natural free will with which we are born. 2. Extrinsic freedom, that freedom for which we must fight for. Freedom is difficult to define due to the negative concept of being a reaction against something. This is known as negative freedom, a reaction against or as freedom from some undesirable position, power or rule. There is also what is known as positive freedom, which is the freedom to do or have. Behind all of our superficial aspects there is some pure inner self that, acting out of it, constitutes the true nature of freedom. Sartre says that pure freedom is consciousness itself. A freedom that is free from determination by all other influences and which allows one to act in a number of different ways. This freedom, as described by Sartre is challenged by the Principle of Universal Causality. This principle states that every event has its......

Words: 570 - Pages: 3

Freedom

...Freedom does not mean license, but the wisdom to choose what is right for oneself ‘Freedom’, be it from fellow humans, prevalent customs, way of life or society, is a word that symbolises man’s intrinsic nature and individuality. It is a feeling that has been experienced and expounded differently by different people: freedom- the ultimate goal of thousands of revolutions, the ideal that inflamed the minds of myriads of nameless, faceless people and their illustrious leaders. Battles for freedom everywhere are coeval with the beginning of hierarchy and civilisation. They are being fought all the time, albeit on different scales. And in all these struggles or movements, the definition of ‘freedom’ is almost always different. This is essentially so since freedom, being a psychological factor is not the same for different people. But, invariably, all these definitions have to undergo the test of time and the scrutiny of history. So, on one hand there are movements for freedom or liberty which have united people and on the other hand there are those movements which have succeeded only in tearing up the social fabric and leave the people high and dry. Thus, freedom is best defined by this time tested statement: “freedom does not mean license, but the wisdom to choose what is right for oneself.” So freedom can never be intrusive that it encroaches upon the rights of others. As Lincoln famously declared in 1859, “Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves”.......

Words: 331 - Pages: 2

Freedom

...mean license, but the wisdom to choose what is right for oneself ‘Freedom’, be it from fellow humans, prevalent customs, way of life or society, is a word that symbolises man’s intrinsic nature and individuality. It is a feeling that has been experienced and expounded differently by different people: freedom- the ultimate goal of thousands of revolutions, the ideal that inflamed the minds of myriads of nameless, faceless people and their illustrious leaders. Battles for freedom everywhere are coeval with the beginning of hierarchy and civilisation. They are being fought all the time, albeit on different scales. And in all these struggles or movements, the definition of ‘freedom’ is almost always different. This is essentially so since freedom, being a psychological factor is not the same for different people. But, invariably, all these definitions have to undergo the test of time and the scrutiny of history. So, on one hand there are movements for freedom or liberty which have united people and on the other hand there are those movements which have succeeded only in tearing up the social fabric and leave the people high and dry. Thus, freedom is best defined by this time tested statement: “freedom does not mean license, but the wisdom to choose what is right for oneself.” So freedom can never be intrusive that it encroaches upon the rights of others. As Lincoln famously declared in 1859, “Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not for themselves”. There are two sides......

Words: 501 - Pages: 3

Freedom

...Changes that began from big economic challenges imposed by China, India, Russia and South America, passing through the war on Iraq and its political and moral costs and now the financial crisis and its repercussions on the Americans and their daily lives and the way they have come to think about their future. This essay aims to evaluate the American Dream and its inside and outside threats and how the rich people have more faith in this dream then the poor. Every nation has an idea or a story to live by. A story that tells the reason behind its existence and the philosophy of this existence. In moments of crisis the citizens of a nation -no matter how big or small that nation is - always go back trying to remember why the nation was founded and how did it succeed? America is no different than this. This nation was born on the ideas of freedom, prosperity for all and equality. Perhaps there is no people who have succeeded in exporting their country’s idea and philosophy to the outside world as much as the Americans’ success in exporting -the idea of America- to the world. The American Dream is something that resembles the political ideology, its essence is the faith in freedom that will enable people to achieve their goals by working hard. As a result, the term American Dream has mesmerized and inspired both the Americans and the world , because they believe that it eliminates the role of social class, race, color or religion the person belongs to in determining his/her......

Words: 335 - Pages: 2

Freedom

...the white people. Blacks did not have the respect they deserved and the right to speak freely. Martin Luther King, however, choose to speak his mind. He spoke to the public about how everyone should be equal. He chose to be a leader and an advocator of freedom. The consequences of his actions were obvious, even to him. However, he had the freedom to choose what he wanted to do with his life, even under the restrictions of society. Black people restricted the popular rapper, Eminem. He was resticted because of his skin color, because rapping was a "black mans sport." Eminem was discouraged by the crowed, who were all black. However, even discouraged by the crowd, Eminem did not want to live in the poor condition he grew up in. He chose to live a better life by rapping for living. Even though discouraged by many, Eminem today is one of the most popular rappers in the world. Surely, this shows that he was not bound by any force that inhibited his choice in life. The lives of Martin Luther King and Eminem are only two examples that clearly illustrates the fact that people are not restricted by rules of society. Schooling, organized religion, discrimination, and other social restrictions do not restrict people. People have freedom to break rules and live the way they want. As a Chinese proverb says, "the sky is the limit."...

Words: 351 - Pages: 2

Freedom Essay

...Walking On a Line of Freedom Freedom. The most amazing gift the founding fathers gave America. The right not only to have a voice and be heard, but also to express that voice with our beliefs and patriotisms. There are those though, that walk that line of freedom and purposely use it to hurt and offend others. T They cause harm and discomfort with their speech or expressions, causing conflict on deciding what’s just and unjust in the constitution. Are they correct in their actions? No, but the First Amendment was made to protect their rights, which include speech and expression. Freedom of speech does not mean it will always be used justly and candidly. In fact, Derek Bok stated, “The fact that speech is protected by the First Amendment does not necessarily mean that it is right, proper, or civil.” (Bok 66) There are those that choose to abuse freedom of speech, and like immature adolescence, seek joy out of insulting and offending others. They are ignorant, insensible, and unenlightened on what the First Amendment was truly made for. This is the reason freedom of speech is not always used justly and properly. Another misunderstood and abused right is the freedom of expression. Expression, is a proclamation or declaration presented in an outward aspect. The First Amendment helps protect laws from violating the right of freedom of expression. This unfortunately just like freedom of speech, does not always mean it is used correctly and honestly. Yet again there are those...

Words: 372 - Pages: 2

Freedom of Speech Essay

...I was at my house and my phone rings and it is my brother’s friend. He had got in a car crash because he didn’t see that there was a curve until it was too late. The driver had got his head put in the front windshield and the passenger hit the roof which made his eye have a medium size cut. In hero literature, authors use heroes to symbolize freedom combined with details that describe power corrupts which within the hero genre allow readers to experience birth and ultimately consider the pattern. First, I believe that a hero has to be someone who goes out of his or her name to help or save someone that they know or even don’t know because I always think of someone who walks up to someone who is homeless and gives them something to eat or even some money. The other thing that I think of would be when you see someone in the hall is having trouble and have dropped their things and you go help them pick it up. Second, in the story The Adventures of Robin Hood, Robin Hood is the hero because he shows how he is overpowering the villain. Robin Hood personifies the spring because he talks about it being spring time a lot. Robin Hood rose above the villain once he started to become famous. This story inspires us to rise above the common person and defeat evil because we see that someone else could do it so we have an example of how to overcome the “evil” in our life. Third, I think that Sundiata personifies a coin at the tip of a mountain because if you hit it at all it will......

Words: 616 - Pages: 3

Freedom

...Therefore, freedom is not absolute. In the West where personal freedom is held in the highest esteem, there are still definable limits. Freedom of speech, in the words of an American jurist, does not include the freedom to yell “Fire!” in a crowded theatre, unless of course there is a fire. America has enshrined in its constitution the Bill of Rights with the specific purpose of protecting the civil liberties of its citizens. Among its provisions are the freedoms of speech, religion, and peaceful assembly, together with the rights of due process. These statutes notwithstanding, they did not protect Japanese Americans from being forcefully relocated and incarcerated during World War II, and more recently, the detention of thousands of Arab-Americans following the 9/11 attacks. Today the injustices perpetrated on those Japanese-Americans are widely acknowledged, but significantly, the Supreme Court decision affirming the legality of that mass detention has yet to be overturned. There will always be limits to freedom; the pertinent question is where those lines are drawn and the role they play in the ordinary lives of the citizens. Limits on human freedom can be viewed likewise. In America there are definite limits but they are more like the moat; the citizens are hardly aware of them. They are not intrusive. Executive powers to establish military tribunals for example, are definite boundaries and gross infringements on the citizens’ freedom. Similarly Canada has its War......

Words: 912 - Pages: 4

Freedom

...What is freedom? Is it an absolute right? We are born to become free. Freedom is defined from different aspects ,and according to different cultures, freedom varies from culture to another. Some define freedom as a natural right, the human being is born with. Everyone wants to be free and independent from others. Freedom is the right to do what one wants, live where he wants, eat what he wants, learns what he wants, and chooses the religion in which he believes, without ignoring or harming other rights. How can we live free? From my point of view, we can live free by respecting other’s rights to live free too. We cannot ignore the rights of people with whom we live in the society. We cannot simply do what we want and ignore others. We must take other people rights into consideration. The idea behind freedom is to be respectful and useful to our society. Freedom is important to everyone. If someone is derived from this innate right, he will definitely feel as if he is not a respectful human being. When freedom is guaranteed, I can think freely, go where i want, say my opinion without fear from people who would not like my opinion. Freedom of opinion is among the most important branches of freedom .In some societies where freedom of opinion is not guaranteed by the authority, the creativity of mind is killed and buried. Society is the largest and biggest loser from this lack of creativity. Someone once said, Freedom of opinion will never result in animosity among people if they...

Words: 887 - Pages: 4

We Do Not Possess Any Genuine Freedom to Act Ethically (a Grade Essay) : )

...There is clear evidence to verify we have freedom to act ethically, we see this through our strong sense of rationalisation through our conscience (Enrich Fromm). There are major flaws to this statement as it could be suggested that ‘ethical’ behaviour is an influence of external factors such as natural laws, religion, primary and secondary carers and prior events. Therefore, the question could be raised, do we actually any have any freedom to act ethically or is it just a result of what we have already learnt (Piaget)? Then again, what is ethical behaviour to begin with? A universal idea of what is right or wrong that is decided by a group of people? The concluding opinion that will be formed is: we do have a genuine amount of freedom however this notion is only supported to a certain extent as I believe we are influenced by external factors. This essay will discuss points that would approve and disapprove of this statement because I believe it is a combination of both, going with a soft determinist approach. Hard determinists would suggest our choices are determined by prior events. This is a logical statement because a choice we make today could affect the choice we would make tomorrow. For example, a levels are picked accordingly due to prior grades we received in GCSE. Aquinas’s cause and effect theory is applicable to this notion of everything have an efficient cause: nothing can be efficient or cause itself. However, despite this approach making total sense as it is...

Words: 1488 - Pages: 6

Freedom

...centuries the word "freedom" has been a topic of debate, and for good reason. There are so many different views of what freedom truly means and what influences it has on our daily lives. According to the American Heritage College Dictionary the word freedom means "The Condition of being free of constraints. To me, the word freedom is being able to achieve anything you want to. It is being able to change your surrounding environment how you want it to be. Many questions have been asked about whether we are truly free of constraints or if everything is predetermined by events that have already transpired. Some believe that it is indeed true that we are not free, that nothing happens freely, and that nothing happens by chance, everything is determined to happen precisely as it does down to the smallest detail. If this statement is true then we are not free, we live a life of predetermined events. In this paper I will discuss many topics regarding freedom including the idea of predetermined events, the use of consequences, and a look back in history at freedom and how it has c... ... middle of paper ... ...ll I am able to choose what I want and change to who I want to be. Living in the United States also plays a big role in my freedom. The United States differs from all other nations. The right to freedom is a gift that is taken for granted. The right of freedom is a gift that no one can take away, a gift that is unseen, but invaluable. Your right to freedom may not be......

Words: 300 - Pages: 2

Red Hat Certified Engineer (RHCE) - 2018 | Trails To Tsukiji S04E11 Cabbage XviD-AFG 27 minutes | Watchfree