Globalization vs Anti-Globalisation

In: Business and Management

Words 2105
Pages 9
Assignment -1
Global Business Environment
Topic: Pro-Globalist Vs Anti-Globalist
Pro-globalist vs. Anti-globalist, the seventh Secretary-General of the United Nations, addressed the force of globalization in his quote, “It has been said that arguing against globalization is like arguing against the laws of gravity. What is Globalization? It is the integration of the world, technologically, economically and politically, wherein the barriers between the national borders are removed to facilitate the flow of goods, capital, services, labour. Global production has created global markets which offer extraordinary growth for organizations in terms of growth & profits. It has led to sharing of ideas & technology, which further leads to innovation and technological progress. However, it is also blamed for increasing the gap between rich and poor, destruction of the environment, and threatening human rights. In the last three years, the anti-globalization movement has staged protests at meetings of the World Trade Organization, the European Union, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the World Economic Forum, and the G-8. Globalization is a powerful real aspect of the new world system, and it represents one of the most influential forces in determining the future course of the planet. Globalization has many dimensions: economic, political, social, cultural, environmental, security, and others. Different people have different interpretations on Globalization. Due to these different interpretations, there are very different reactions, some consider it as a danger to the world economic system, this group of people is referred to as Anti-globalists & others consider it as advancement to the world economy, referred to as Pro-globalists. It is an ongoing process by which regional economies, societies, and cultures have become integrated through a…...

Similar Documents

Apple vs. Samsung Effects of Globalization

...Introduction The purpose of this paper is to analyze the technology industry with a particular focus on the Smartphone industry. The companies that will be compared in this paper are Apple and Samsung. This paper will begin with a brief overview of the history of each of the companies as well as their initial business strategies and core competencies. In addition to this, it will be addressing globalization, the drivers to globalization and the affects that it had toward the business strategies of each of the two companies. Furthermore, the paper will look at the technological advances that have occurred in the industry and how that has impacted the companies, along with how it has shaped each business in order to keep up with the rapidly evolving and expanding market. Lastly, it shall explore what the companies are planning for the future and some of the trends that are occurring within the industry that may be influencing Apple and Samsung. Brief report of Companies Apple Apple Inc., formerly Apple Computer, Inc., is a multinational corporation that creates consumer electronics, computer software, and commercial servers. The company was founded by Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak on April 1, 1976 and was later incorporated the company on January 3, 1977, in Cupertino, California. In 1985, Jobs left Apple and founded NeXT, acquired the graphics division of Lucasfilm (Pixar), and joined the Disney’s Board of Directors. It was not until 1997 that Jobs returned to Apple and...

Words: 3189 - Pages: 13

Globalization and Anti Globalization

...Globalization is the principally new step in the development of the long-term process of internationalization (transnationalization) of the economic, political, cultural, legal and other aspects of the society's life, at the point when interrelationships between the national socials have reached such a level, when some drastic changes within the entire world community gradually transforming into the integral society institute, became inevitable.  The level of economic, scientific, technological, legal and informational interrelationships of the national industries have reached a point, when at least three principally novel features are imminent. First, the world's economic community, formerly seen as loosely connected multiple countries, is gradually transforming into the integral economic system, with national societies now representing the constituents of the integral world's economic body.  Second, while conditions of globalization, national and global economic issues are swapping roles. With the development of international financial and other markets as well as production-sale structures, the global economic relationships more and more acquire the role of leading and governing structures. Even internal affairs of large and powerful countries, not to mention the remaining ones, are forced to adapt to the realities of the global economy.  Third, globalization process objectively leads to elimination and weakening of the regulatory functions of the national state,......

Words: 719 - Pages: 3

Globalisation Versus Anti Globalisation

...Globalization and Anti-Globalization: An Indian Perspective If one is going to talk about globalization, the term globalization must be defined. That’s the easy part. Globalization is defined as free cross-border flow of goods, services, capital, labour, information, ideas, intellectual property. Everything in fact. Defined thus, globalization is more than mere trade reform. Globalization has a descriptive component, as well as a prescriptive one, with the latter more important than the former. The former is simply a factual statement. Over a period of time, globalization has increased in importance and countries have become less insular. It is possible to argue that one encountered such globalization also in the 19th century. There are however two differences between earlier phases of globalization and the present one. First, the speed of change is faster. Second, because most flows (including capital) are private ones, governments have become less powerful in controlling or determining the shape of globalization. However, there is a prescriptive element to globalization as well. The cross-country empirical evidence is fairly robust that more open economies tend to perform better than more insulated ones. Borders are after all artificial boundaries, created by governments. They are irrelevant for purposes of efficient resource allocation. The logic of Adam Smith’s specialization and division of labour does not become any less compelling because......

Words: 3686 - Pages: 15

Globalization vs Cultural Diversity

...cultural diversity and globalization is present or not, and if globalization does indeed pose a threat to cultural diversity. “The negative side to globalization is that it wipes out entire economic systems and in doing so wipes out the accompanying culture.” Peter L. Berger (American sociologist) Globalization is broken down into different categories, these being cultural, economical, political and technological globalization. It is due this process that barriers are broken down and interaction occurs between individuals of different races, nationalities and cultural back grounds. It is a movement towards an integrated global economy characterized by the free exchange of goods and capital. In popular discourse, Globalization is often related to the Internet revolution, free-market economies and the predominantly western political, economic and cultural lifestyle. This movement is supported by a large range of modern technologies. It is because of globalization that society believes that wealth and higher standards of living will strike developing nations. The above statement was supported by authors of the book, the effect of globalization on African countries: an over view of Nigeria. The two authors (C. R. Eze and J Nkwede) firmly believe that globalization is a strong enforcer of development and poverty reduction in Africa. Plenty agree with Eze and Nkwede as they have deemed the process as a positive one, but from a negative perspective, globalization also results......

Words: 1076 - Pages: 5

Globalization vs. Localization in Education

...Republic of the Philippines SURIGAO DEL SUR STATE UNIVERSITY Lianga Campus Lianga, Surigao del Sur _________________________________________________________________¬_ Final Examination in MAEM 207 Organizational Development and Management Test I- Say something about the following choose only 3. (5 points each). 1. Globalization Vs. Localization in Education 2. Organizational Management Vs. Organizational Development 3. Organizational Effectiveness Vs. Organizational Efficiency 4. Management Control Vs. Management Evaluation 5. Management Theories Vs. Management Approaches Test – II- Answer the following in questions substantially. Select only 3. ( 20 points each) 1. Discuss the framework of Organizational Development. Cite at least 3 theories as its foundation. Explain its roles or contribution towards organizational change and effectiveness. 2. Identify the complete O.D. process according to Newstrom and Davis. Explain each component viz-a-viz the concept and praxis in the context of school management. 3. Gender and Development ( GAD) is an issues (given) to be addressed by every Agency of the Government. In the context of educational, how will you address this in your school management and development? 4. Total Quality Management (TQM) by Deming is a challenging strategy. Identify or trace its effectiveness to organizational management and development. 5. Attaining Development or success in an organization in a matter of......

Words: 286 - Pages: 2


...Anti- globalization The global movement is broadly critical of the policies of economic neoliberalism, or “corporate globalization,” that has guided international trade and development since the closing decades of the 20th century. Varied communities organizing against the local and national consequences of neoliberal policies, especially in the global South, connect their actions with this wider effort. * Industries have no respect for the environment. Large companies install their factories in third world countries, where environment legislation is more lax or almost nonexistent, they don’t only endangered, irreversibly, the biodiversity of the planet but also the native populations. * Massive inflows of foreign investment in developing countries cannot be effectively absorbed, especially in regard to environmental protection and workers' rights. This is because developing countries standards and enforcement mechanisms are not as well established. * Workers are seen as having their traditional lives irreversibly disrupted by globalization and/or being treated less favorably than the same multinationals would treat those in developed countries. In this instance, it is often recognized that local political sovereignty may not be enough; global rules are needed to ensure that multinationals can't exploit workers. * Countries' individual cultures are becoming overpowered by Americanisation. Several of the largest US brands (McDonald's and Starbucks) face......

Words: 404 - Pages: 2

Globalization vs Localization

...Globalization vs. Localization Discussion Points: 1. Leave it to the corporations, bankers and global bureaucracies – “the only route out of poverty for the world's poor” – to do the planning and solve the world's problems. So far, almost all of the evidence from the past three decades (1970-2000) - the period of economic globalization's most rapid ascendancy - shows that it is bringing exactly the opposite outcome that its advocates claim. Clearly, poverty and inequality are rapidly accelerating everywhere on earth. A 1999 report by the United Nations Development Program found that inequalities between rich and poor within and among countries are quickly expanding, and that the global trading and finance system is one of the primary causes. Even the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) confirms the United Nations' (UN) conclusions, agreeing that globalization brings massive inequalities. The benefits of globalization do not reach the poor, says the CIA, and the process inevitably brings increased global protest and chaos. Robert Wade of the London School of Economics, wrote in The Economist (2001), "Global inequality is worsening rapidly...Technological change and financial liberalization result in a disproportionately fast increase in the number of households at the extreme rich end, without shrinking the distribution at the poor end...From 1988 to 1993, the share of the world income going to the poorest 10 percent of the world's population fell by over a......

Words: 1126 - Pages: 5

“Pro” vs. “Anti” Globalization: the New Divide

...Chapter 2. Globalization in Question 1. “Pro” vs. “Anti” Globalization: The New Divide For a number of years, the question of economic globalization—i.e., the interdependence of national systems of production and exchange and the ―financialization‖ of the world (revealed by the American subprime crisis in 2007)—has polarized public opinion. The problems stemming from economic globalization dominate the news: the outsourcing production in search of cheaper labor costs; the decreasing efficiency of national juridical and fiscal regulation; the waning of the very idea of sovereignty; the growing constraints within which politicians can act; the emergence of a small class of the immensely rich alongside the billions of poor; the rise of new financial actors—pension funds, hedge funds, and sovereign wealth funds—capable of destabilizing or seizing control of entire realms of the economy; and the emergence of China and India as new global economic actors, as their companies storm the industrial bastions of the United States and Europe. Should one be for or against globalization? Can we turn our backs on globalization, and return to national or regional systems of production and exchange that are autonomous, even autarkic? Is the large cosmopolitan corporation the new leviathan—a monster that must be slain—or a force for human progress? It is tempting to reduce the debate over the economy of the twenty-first century to a simple alternative: being for or against globalization.......

Words: 12272 - Pages: 50


...Anti Globalization Michael Albert said that globalization leads to "...a thug's economy, a heartless economy, a base and vile and largely boring economy. It is the antithesis of human fulfillment and development. It mocks equity and justice. It enshrines greed (Globalization Quotes.)" Globalization is a harmful process and it has created more havoc and negative effects than good outcomes. Furthermore, some argue that globalization will help the world deal with crises like poverty and unemployment; this however, is no true. The International Forum on Globalization stated that globalization led to a "sharp increase in unemployment in both the North and the South as corporate activity becomes more mobile, unrestricted, opaque, and unaccountable (Globalization Quotes.)" This process does, in fact, lead to massive unemployment and high poverty levels. The growth in trade has, in general, created more jobs but the equivalent growth in competition has made many companies fire their workers so that they may cut costs, boost efficiency and increase profits. The less developed countries had some negative effects to deal with. For example, China, while experiencing economic growth, has also begun to struggle with unemployment. Studies show that increased trade between the North and South has lead to a decrease in the income equality between semiskilled and skilled workers in the South. On the other hand, the inequality grew among such workers in the North. The manufactured goods......

Words: 544 - Pages: 3

Globalisation vs Imperialism

...If you care to count, globalisation is a thirteen-letter word. Perhaps that is why many are tempted to believe that there is a primeval curse on the phenomenon. As the focal point of unending controversy, globalisation has been both lauded to the skies and decried vehemently – often for the same effects. And in a world where economic integration is widely viewed as “detrimental” to poorer nations, many would agree emphatically with the motion of the house – that globalisation is imperialism repackaged. While making their zealous arguments, however, most critics overlook the fact that by very definition globalisation and imperialism are near-polar opposites. A natural confusion, considering the growing trend of socialistic thought. After all, Lenin wrote extensively about how capitalism was nothing but the parasitic exploitation of the weak nations by the powerful. Central to this perspective is the one where multinationals are considered as monopolistic villains operating in a global playing field without regulations. Here again, with the yoke of the British and the East India company barely off their backs, former colonies can but look upon the phenomenon of integration with deep distrust. And thus, what is in fact the concept of unfettered trade among all countries was blown up to the proportions of an exploitative force to crush developing nations for the selfish interests of the capitalists. At the very onset of our argument, therefore, we arrive at an ambiguity.......

Words: 837 - Pages: 4

2.03 Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists

...The federalist structure of government is the one that is best for this nation. Federalists wanted to make a change; a change for the people. They want an established government that is ruled or governed by the people, unlike the Anti-Federalists who wanted to keep the same monarchy government and didn’t seek a change for the people. A monarchy has proven to be corrupt because only the higher-class had the right to power and the lower-class had no say. For this reason, the Federalists wanted to separate the powers of the government into their own branches in order to avoid a corrupt government. Because of this, Federalism would be the best option for this country. Federalists strongly desired a government for the people. They also wanted the constitution to be ratified as quickly as possible with the use of editing. Federalists also believed that some power should be taken out of the states and put into the government, and that the government should be respectfully separated into three branches. Federalist paper no. 39 states: “It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppression by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of the republicans and claim for their governments the honorable title of republic.” By separating the government into different branches, the Federalists has the idea......

Words: 615 - Pages: 3

Calvinist vs Anti-Calvinist in Dr.Faustus

...The Calvinist/anti-Calvinist controversy The theological implications of Doctor Faustus have been the subject of considerable debate throughout the last century. Among the most complicated points of contention is whether the play supports or challenges the Calvinist doctrine of absolute predestination, which dominated the lectures and writings of many English scholars in the latter half of the sixteenth century. According to Calvin, predestination meant that God, acting of his own free will, elects some people to be saved and others to be damned – thus, the individual has no control over his own ultimate fate. This doctrine was the source of great controversy because it was seen by the so-called anti-Calvinists to limit man's free will in regard to faith and salvation, and to present a dilemma in terms of theodicy. At the time Doctor Faustus was performed, this doctrine was on the rise in England, and under the direction of Puritan theologians at Cambridge and Oxford had come to be considered the orthodox position of the Church of England.[20] Nevertheless, it remained the source of vigorous and, at times, heated debate between Calvinist scholars, such as William Whitaker and William Perkins, and anti-Calvinists, such as William Barrett and Peter Baro.[21] The dispute between these Cambridge intellectuals had quite nearly reached its zenith by the time Marlowe was a student there in the 1580s, and likely would have influenced him deeply, as it did many of his fellow......

Words: 829 - Pages: 4

Anti Federalist vs. Federalist

...Both Federalists and Anti-Federalist was both established from Washington’s cabinet. Jefferson who was an anti-federalist, was the secretary of state and hamilton, who was a federalist, was the secretary of the treasury. both parties thought presidents should be voted in by the public, (white males to specific). they based their ideas from the Enlightenment. Overall, they both wanted to keep the liberties of the people protected and wanted representative government. it is important to understand the two opposing view because the two groups untimely forged our nation, and they also created the basic of today two party political system. Opposing Views Federalists Anti-Federalist they were the supporters of a larger national government. they were a group of people that opposed the ratification of the proposed constitution in 1787. Federalists felt like the Bill of Rights addition was not necessary, because they believe that the constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. propose and supported the Bill of Rights addition because they claimed the constitution gave the central government too much power, and without the bill of rights the people would be at risk of oppression. felt that the states were free agents that should manage their own revenue and spend their money as they say fit. felt that many individual and different fiscal and monetary policies led to economic struggles and national weakness. favored dividing the power among different......

Words: 380 - Pages: 2

Economic Globalization Pro vs. Con

...Economic globalization and trade liberalization have released many restrictions in regards to trade. Now, foreign countries can communicate and distribute items very cheaply compared to previous years. Yet, controversial opinions arose and residents have questioned the effects of economic globalization as an advantageous venture. I completely agree with those people. Supporters of economic globalization state that it brings cheaper products and increased availability of diverse products. Because items can be manufactured and produced cheaper in foreign countries, they can be sold cheaper. Because of economic globalization, we can take advantage of this and provide cheaper products to our residents while producing and distributing the products cheaper as well. Furthermore, regarding the increased availability of products, more products become available to us because of our multiple outlets to several foreign countries. That is to say, we can obtain items from not only China and Japan, but from Australia, the Middle East, countries in Africa, and many more. (Maybe add on?) While economic globalization has gained a positive connotation, there are negative aspects that have more strength refuting its so-called progressiveness. These negative aspects include a job loss and an increase dependency on foreign countries. The majority of the items we buy today come from foreign countries and will continue to come from foreign countries. As a result, local monopolies and industries...

Words: 445 - Pages: 2

Pro-Globalist vs Anti Globalists

...21st March,2012 A Report on Pro-Globalist Vs Anti-Globalist Indian Civilization depicts one of the oldest and most interesting chronology. The inception of the Indian Civilization took place in Indus Valley and therefore called Indus Valley Civilization (3300–1300 BCE) contemporaries of Mesopotamia and Egyptian Civilizations. Much lately, it was the great Chandragupta (321 BC) who expanded his Empire to Bengal and Assam in the east, to the Afghanistan and Baluchistan in the west, to Kashmir and Nepal in the north and to the Deccan in the south after defeating Nand Emperor. The trade & commerce was operated to India by land route only. Medieval history witnessed the glory of Indian subcontinent which attracted many Emperors to this rich and fertile land. It started with the invasion of Ghenghis Khan (1160-1227),who pursued an aggressive foreign policy which started with the Mongol invasion of East and central Asia. During his regime, Mongol empire eventually occupied most of the Asian nations. On the other side Alexander III of Macedon (356 BC) attacked India at 326 BC and lost the battle with Porus and returned thinking that perhaps India is the end of world. India remain the prime target of Sultans of Eurasia, Greeks, Romans and Turks. The rich resources of Indian soil attracted Timur Lane (1336-1405) who invaded India in Tughlaq dynasty and looted its resources .Ghulam, Khilji, Tuglaq, Saiyid, Lodi and finally with Mughal dynasties had ruled India. Just some years......

Words: 1527 - Pages: 7

Buchimaru Chaos | New Amsterdam | francia140