Everest Simulation

In: Business and Management

Submitted By canario48
Words 756
Pages 4
Leadership and Teamwork
A Reflective Report on the Everest Simulation
The Everest simulation used the dramatic context of a Mount Everest expedition as related to management concepts exploring the role of leadership, effective communication, and team work to achieve success. The simulation required students to work in cohesive teams consisting of five members, where each individual was assigned a specific role and a goal. The roles included the team leader, physician, environmentalist, photographer, and marathoner. Some goals were contradictory in order to assess how the team reacted to complex and sometimes conflicting situations. Before the actual simulation started, the group discussed the general approach and how to deal with situations where personal goals collided with the team’s goals.
The distinction between working with a team and working as a team was the main lesson I learned from the simulation. Listed below are objective barriers our team encountered during the simulation, some of which we succeeded in overcoming and some of which we did not.
We succeeded at:
1. Planning: Good decision making seldom took place by chance. We fully discussed the decision making process and always took action as a team.
2. Performance: The need for individual high scores did not encourage team members to act in detriment of the team. Although each team member was assigned individual roles and tasks to accomplish, we all aimed for the shared goal first.
3. Cohesion: Even when making erroneous decisions, like the allocation of insufficient numbers of oxygen tanks, we all agreed on the decisions and assumed responsibility for our errors. There was never polarization or finger pointing during the simulation exercise.
4. Trust: All team members identified and provided full information they possessed. This is because we built trust from the start and gave support to…...

Similar Documents

Everest Executive Summary

...This report provides an in-depth analysis of the two Everest Simulations conducted by Group 10 of MGMT1001 Thursday Tutorial. This task required students to form teams consisting of five to six members whose goals were to summit Mount Everest. While it provided us with a rich experience in team dynamics and collaboration, it also enabled us to explore key managerial concepts taught in the course, consisting of: • Communication • Groups and Teams • Leadership In this report, we examine the effectiveness of Face to Face Communication (FTFC) versus Computer Mediated Communication (CMC), and the problems encountered through the utilisation of the virtual medium including efficiency of the feedback system, loss of personal focus and other emergent issues. It includes personal reflections on attitudes and perceptions, as well as group performance and strategies adopted in the second Simulation in order to create a more positive team experience. Theories which relate to interpersonal communication have also been integrated in the report to illustrate its relation to certain situations encountered during the Simulation. Additionally, we provide a multifaceted analysis on the notion of team cohesiveness and how it attributes to better performance outcomes. An overview on the different intragroup conflicts encountered in the Simulation has been included, examining the positive and negative impact that conflict had on team experience and performance, and how mutual agreements were......

Words: 287 - Pages: 2

Mgmt Everest

...the assignment of members to groups, each group undertook the Everest Simulation – a teamwork and leadership challenge requiring groups to ascent a virtual Mount Everest. Drawing upon a range of fundamental organisational and managerial concepts and coupled with frequent challenges, the simulation effectively replicated a dynamic and teamwork based organisational environment. The simulation seeks to test interpersonal relationships and group dynamics by creating dissonance on both an individual and group level, as groups and group members strive to achieve both individual and group goals. This report will critically analyse the very processes used to undertake the Everest Simulation, along with results, focusing on the three concepts of ‘Communication’, ‘Groups and Teams’ and ‘Leadership’. These are of critical importance to forming an analysis of not only the simulation itself, but also a broader organisational and managerial situation and the correlation between managerial theory and practice and the Everest Simulation. The transition in dynamics within the group between the different simulations, and the solving of numerous challenges corresponds to the improvement in our results of the simulation. Moreover, this transition and triumph also elucidates the practicality of managerial theories associated with ‘communication’, ‘groups and teams’ and ‘leadership’ and their applicability to not only the Everest Simulation, my personal and group results, but also the wider......

Words: 2073 - Pages: 9

Reflection About Everest Simulation

...1. Round 1, Base Camp At first, the team generally discussed about each role’s condition and got to know about the simulation system. One teammate suggested sharing personal goals. After warmly discussion and voting, the team agreed to share personal goals. Soon we realized that there were some conflicts within the team about whether to follow the team goals or personal goals. However, we decided to rely on teamwork to achieve our common goal, Avoid Rescue and furthermore to try our best to reach the summit. Open talk and honestly sharing information helps a team build up trust and deepen personal understanding. However, time is limited when to reach a consensus for most situations. I realized that, my role, the marathoner, is ambitious and energetic, therefore, the character may have strong bias to push the team to the top and willing to take higher risks. In concern of this, I decided to behave the opposite way, listen more to the team and use team wisdom to fairly decide what to do. 2. Round 2, Base Camp 2 At Base Camp 2, we checked team status on heath, weather prediction, frost-bite dangers, supplies, speed and food. We realized that our environmentalist was weak at Camp 2. When asked about what help she needs, she could not analyze (based on information available) about what help she needs. But after a double check round, we found a cure for her. Even though I strongly disagreed to rest just for her, the team decided to take a rest for the further rush, so I......

Words: 569 - Pages: 3


...reflection of my experiences of The Everest group simulation z3238040 Seung Kon Back ● The Executive Summary The team 1 was organised to perform two Everest simulations and its members were Seungkon, Florence, Yajia, Michael, Manas and Rebecca. This report is a record of experiences during the simulations and also aims to describe the team’s experiences and critically analyse the results and communication structures. It was found that the main factor of the team’s failure is attributable to poor performance of a physician and there were some communicative conflicts. A disappointing performance is linked with the concepts of cognitive dissonance, task cohesiveness and social loafing. It also was confirmed that the problem of communication is associated with several factors such as the linguistic barrier, stereotyping, different decision-making styles, the internet-network communication and different cultures. Table of Contents ● The executive summary p2 ● Introduction p4 ● Everest team experience p4-6 ● Analysis of team’s result p7-9 ● Analysis of team’s communication structures and experiencep9-11 ● Conclusion p12 ● Bibliographyp13-14 ● Appendicesp15-19 ● Introduction The members of team 1 (Seungkon, Florence, Yajia, Michael, Manas and Rebecca) were supposed to do Everest simulation at week 5 and 8. Before the first simulation, as I had not had any experiences with other members and also I had no experiences regarding Everest simulation, there was a lack of......

Words: 3065 - Pages: 13

Monte Everest

...DEFINICION DEL PROBLEMA PRIORIZAR EL OBJETIVO A TODO COSTO DE LLEGAR A LA CIMA DE LA MONTAÑA EN LUGAR DE PRIORIZAR LA SUPERVIVENCIA DEL EQUIPO ANALISIS DEL CASO Adventures Consultant (Equipo de Hall) | Mountain Madness (Equipo de Fischer) | FORTALEZAS | FORTALEZAS | Experiencia del lider del equipo: Escaló las 7 cumbres, realizó 4 intentos para llegar a cima del Everest (1 vez con éxito).Habia guiado a 39 clientes | Experiencia del lider del equipo, escaló varias cumbres, realizó 4 intentos para llegar a la cima del Everest (1 vez con éxito). | Contrato equipo experimentado: Mike Groom y Andy Harris | Contrato equipo experiementado:Boukreev y Beidleman | DEBILIDADES | DEBILIDADES | Reclutamiento de clientes heterogeneo, algunos sin experiencia en escalar montañas de gran altura | Reclutamiento de cliente heterogéneo, varios de los clientes nunca habían estado expuestos a grandes alturas. En su equipo contaba con una persona de 68 años de edad | Falta de confianza y comunicación entre los miembros del equipo. | Falta de confianza y comunicación entre los miembros del equipo. | Competencia y rivalidad entre los lideres | Competencia y rivalidad entre los lideres | OPORTUNIDADES | Compartir experiencia y fortalezas entre los lideres y guias de los dos equipos de la incursión | Organizar estrategia en conjunto y compartir equipos (excasos en ambos grupos) para el logro del objetivo. | AMENAZAS | Clima hostil a grandes alturas: Falta de oxígeno,......

Words: 786 - Pages: 4

Mount Everest

...After understanding and analyzing the tragedy of Mount Everest , May 1996 that took lives of eight climbers during summit attempts, we can conclude that the tragedy may occur due to several root causes whether it is by nature or human error. The major factor that leads to this tragedy is that all the climbers are lack of team work and communication. Even though they are in the same expedition but they have their own individual’s goal, eager to reach at the summit. For example, Jon Krakauer one of the clients of Adventure Consultant said that he felt disconnected from the climbers around him, they were a team in name only. Supposedly, during the acclimatization exercises, the climbers should take time to get to know each other, learn their responsibilities as a team build their confidence and trust to their teammates, instead they were doubting each other whether they could rely own their team member during difficult times. That also might cause this tragedy, which is lack of trust towards team member. One of the potential causes of the tragedy was overconfidence. Overconfidence occurs when leaders believe that their experience, abilities, skill, or maybe even luck, will allow them to overcome any challenge they face. Research has shown that such overconfidence can lead to poor decision making as leaders substitute their own personal skill for careful analysis of the situation and planning. Hall, in particular, may have been prone to overconfidence. He had reached the summit...

Words: 333 - Pages: 2

Everest Report Mgmt1001

...MGMT1001: Everest Report Andrew Lau A critical and reflective self-evaluation of my experiences during the Everest team simulation in the contexts of ‘attitudes, personalities & perceptions’, ‘power & conflict’ and ‘groups & teams’. Executive Summary The Everest simulation is a team simulation designed to emulate real life group processes and the diverse range of intergroup interactions this entails. Developed by Harvard Business School, participants are grouped into teams of 5 (with an optional sixth member, the observer) that make a virtual climb up Mount Everest. Performance is assessed through both individual and team goals that are provided throughout the simulation. Members were allocated into groups randomly within tutorial groups and assigned roles within the simulation. I was assigned the role of environmentalist, but assumed the informal role as one of the team’s leaders. Our group as a whole managed to achieve a satisfactory 67% of team goals, and I managed to achieve 57% of my individual goals. The objective of this report is to critically analyse and reflect upon the intergroup interactions that lead to the successes and failings of our team. These successes and failings will be viewed through the lens of the theories and concepts developed in the course in order to gain insight into group processes and human behaviour. The report starts with analysing and breaking down human cognitive processes and social interactions through the......

Words: 3899 - Pages: 16

Everest Simulation

...Title Page Everest stimulation experience Analysis Student name: Zacui Lao Student number: Z3413905 Course: MGMT1001 Tutorial time: Tueday 5-6 pm Tutor’s name: Shanil .S Date: 19, May, 2013 Executive summary This paper is written to analysis the individual and team’s experience and results according to three course concepts 1) Communication; 2) Groups and Teams and 3) Leadership. It examines the theories on these three topics both form the course and outside the course combining personal experience. It has found that communication, although with many different forms. Writing skills, oral presentation and interpersonal communication are usually more valued. Organisation nowadays generally divides employees into groups and teams in order to achieve higher productivity and effectiveness. Lastly, leadership, despite the different theories relating to it, they all emphasise the importance of leadership in an organisation and it is always desirable. Table of contents Catalogue Title Page 1 Executive summary 1 Table of contents 2 Introduction 3 Body 3 Communication 3 Groups and Teams 5 Leadership 6 Conclusion 8 Appendices 9 Goals on Track 9 Team contract 9 Reference List 12 Introduction Throughout out the course of MGMT 1001, our assigned team with 7 members has conducted two simulations, during which each participant played different roles as climbers attempting to reach the summit. Both of the simulations were conducted face-......

Words: 3478 - Pages: 14

Mt Everest Simulation

...Mt. Everest Simulation- Personal Reflection Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction to Mount Everest team and Leadership simulation 2 2.0 Our Team Process Efficacy 3 2.1 The role of the leader 3 2.2 Psychological Safety 5 2.3 Group Thinking 7 3.0 Conclusions 8 4.0 Reference 9 1.0 Introduction to Mount Everest team and Leadership simulation Climbing Mount Everest is a dangerous undertaking, a Herculean task fraught with difficulties, danger, complexities and volatile weather conditions. Disaster can strike without warning, leaving the most competent and experienced professional high altitude mountain climber gasping for breath, and desperately fighting to stay alive. Death is not uncommon to mountaineers who ascend Mt. Everest, a simple mistake, faulty judgments, miscommunication, wrong decisions or complacency can lead to disastrous consequences. Indeed, climbing Mt. Everest cannot be accomplished alone, individuals need to work together as a team, cooperate and collaborate with one another, and rely on one another's capabilities to ascend the mountain summit successfully. Everest leadership and team multimedia simulation is an attempt to help the participants experience and understand team dynamics and leadership. It requires participants to work as a unit, a cohesive entity, collaborating and communicating essential information in order to make effective decisions that will benefit individuals and the group in achieving their goals. The......

Words: 3700 - Pages: 15

Everest Simulation

...Lessons learnt from simulation We as a team performed well as an individual doing their task. This was because team was prepared and understood their own profile very well and 50% of other’s profiles. However, where we failed as a team was to collaborate. We moved from Forming Storming Norming during the prep time, medical challenge and weather challenge respectively, however during oxygen challenge we went back to the Storming stage [Jurgens (Director) (2015, July 12)]. This could be partly attributed to the fact that we had some technical difficulties with remote connections, shortcoming to our psychological safety and communication issues. My profile was that of a ‘leader.’ My main goal was to steer the team to move towards the summit point. As the book by Gladwell (2005) suggests there are at-least seven things that need to wrong, in-order to experience a fatal crash, I did live this on the day of simulation assignment. It was my travel day at work I was working from hotel where the internet connection was bad. As a result, I missed some of the key portions discussed prior to the simulation task. My mind was in panic mode and with constant fear of failure of this exercise. It could cost me some points from my grade [Edmondson & Roloff (2009)].Once I overcame the connectivity issue, I began to actively participate. During the initial 15 min time frame, when we as a team were sharing each other’s profile information and goals, our “observer” asked the......

Words: 751 - Pages: 4

Mount Everest Simulation

... According to Kreitner and Kinicki, a group is defined as “two or more freely interacting individuals who share collective norms and goals and have a common identity” (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013, p. 269). A team is defined as “a small number of people with complementary skills who are committed to a common purpose, performance goals, and approach for which they hold themselves mutually accountable” (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013, p.300). The team exercise was a simulated climb of Mt. Everest, with each member having a unique role during the simulation. According to Psychologist Bruce Tuckman, there are five stages in group development including forming, storming, norming, performing, and a later added adjourning (Kreitner & Kinicki, 2013). Not only was the Harvard Publishing Leadership and Team Simulation: Everest V2  a simulation in climbing Mt Everest, it was a lesson in executing a group challenge. The formation of the team began with the team assignments from the professor. There was some confusion as to who was on what team but after a few days; one after the other was present for the forming processes. It took a few days for everyone to collaborate and get their schedules all to work out to complete this task. Communication between team members was initially challenging trying to figure out the best method of communication between group members. Some members communicated more than others in the discussion board. A slower method of communication was......

Words: 1966 - Pages: 8

Everest Essay Final

...MGMT 1001 Assignment 2 – Report – 30% of Final Mark Report Focus: Write a report reflecting on your experiences of the Everest group simulation exercise this semester with reference to concepts and theories encountered in this course. Executive Summary Everest, a virtual game designed by Harvard Business School and Forio Business Simulations, forces players to challenge problems that arise and conquer them as a team. After viewing a frightening video that portrays the mountain climbing experience, students are arranged in groups of five and assigned different roles with varying description and goals, ranging from ambitious athletes to preservative environmentalists. Confronting numerous challenges such as oxygen scarcity, unpredictable weather and volatile health conditions, teams progress up the mountain, with the ultimate goal of reaching the summit. The game is intelligent in its simplistic design – it gives different goals and information to each player. The physician has knowledge on numerous diseases, but is unable to use it if the marathoner fails to announce her critical health condition – a probable situation as the game encourages players to hide the information. In hindsight, our team was given two attempts to complete the simulation. The first simulation was conducted with little experience and understanding of group members and roles. Formation of conspiracies led to discomfort due to conflicting personal goals, limited resources,...

Words: 4808 - Pages: 20

Mount Everest

...1 1 Mount Everest-1996 2 2 Executive Summary Background The case study describes a team ascending Mount Everest led by Scott Fischer and Rob Hall. The primary concept behind the case study is to distinguish qualities in the team’s plan, action, and most importantly leadership. The clients and the leaders in the report show lack of readiness to ascend the mountain. Fischer along with Hall led many people to their deaths because of bad leadership skills. The report outlines how the two leaders failed to communicate with their team. The expedition team needed a better action plan with clear and concise steps to follow in order to keep everyone alive. The breakdown and analysis of the case is reported here. Results Scott Fischer and Rob Hall were not prepared to be leaders. Their skills were lacking and they were only doing things for themselves. Fischer and Hall were clearly acting in the pre-conventional stage of development. They did not value any objections to ideas or procedures. The two leaders acted in a high power distance setting, neither were comfortable allowing inexperienced individuals have a voice. They failed to keep in mind they were running a business. Their actions were the primary reason many climbers lost their lives. The report outlines the communication errors and expresses potential solutions that could have saved lives. Conclusion Communication is a primary factor in the business environment. Leaders need to communicate their......

Words: 1615 - Pages: 7

Everest Sim

...EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Everest group simulation was an exercise which encouraged five students to play a unique and vital role on a team of hikers, attempting to reach the summit of Mount Everest. The simulation powerfully encapsulated the concepts and theories learnt in this course, illustrating the power of groups. The purpose of this report is to reflect on the experiences encountered during the Everest team experience and identify how these experiences related to the course. It comprises of a description and analysis of the Everest Team experience, a critical analysis of the team’s performance and results and a critical analysis of the team’s communication interactions. Upon taking part in both the simulations, it was discovered that the team score was dramatically improved, from 46% to 83%. This improvement was attributed to the team’s enhanced performance, due to progressing through the team development stages, as our performance was superior in the ‘norming’ and ‘performing’ stages rather than the ‘forming’ and ‘storming’ stages. Another factor which enhanced the team’s performance and thus, team score was the alterations in group structure. By assigning roles to each team member, a defined structure was associated with a distinct change in direction. In addition, changing from directive decision-making to analytic as well as collaborating instead of forcing and accommodating to resolve conflict revealed improved team dynamics leading to an overall better result.......

Words: 3665 - Pages: 15


...With constant change and demand, it is extremely challenging for organizations to figure out how to improve performance. For organizations to stay afloat they must depend on all who are a part of the organization. The purpose of this paper is to provide a summary of the Improving Organizational Performance simulation, to briefly describe the situation, recommend solution (s), state the results, and summarize the organizational psychology concepts addressed in the simulation by answering specific questions. “Improving Organizational Performance” simulation was based on Airdevils, a professional aerial stunts firm who provides services for motion picture and television production, demonstration events, publicity stunts, and marketing campaigns. Airdevils is an organization based in Salt Lake City, Utah founded by Celsey Evan in 1995. She started the company solo and was joined by four of her colleagues a year later. Today there are 115 employees on the payroll. The five founding team members are now retired and manage the organization. The types of stunts Airdevils perform include: skydiving, sky surfing, hang gliding, and paragliding. Until two years ago Airdevils has received numerous national and international awards for their daring aerial stunts. The past two years have yielded no awards for the organization. Faithful clients have expressed dissatisfaction with the quality of stunts. In addition, several top employees have resigned and, to complicate matters,...

Words: 506 - Pages: 3

民族舞基本课件-蒙古舞-01、手位组合.mp4 | Bits and Pieces | Richard Burgi