Ethics: Recipients vs. Donors

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By bethlara1
Words 632
Pages 3
To: The Board of Transplantation Recipients and Donors

From: Beth Lara, Lead Surgeon, MD.

Subject: Transplantation Recipients

Date: February 8, 2015

Purpose: The purpose of this memo today is how I, Beth Lara MD. Leading Surgeon of this council, will decide which patient will receive this heart transplant that has just recently become available. I will discuss and decide which patient I believe out of the three will be getting this transplant based on an utilitarian decision making process. I will discuss the different factors which helped me come to my decision and I will do my very best on communicating my decision as well as how I arrived there. Thank You.

Summary: Here is the summary, briefly, of the three candidates that will be involved in this particular transplant case. First we have Jerry. Jerry is a 55 yr. old husband and father of 3. He supports his family by managing a carpet business in which he is nearly 5 years from retirement with the business. Jerry’s wife Joanie is a stay at home mother with no education more than a high school diploma as well as stable career path, but she has raised 3 amazing children who are all teenagers now entering college, except for their middle child who is autistic. Jerry needs this transplant to be to be able to continue to provide for his family. I think it’s important to mention that Dr.’s presume his outcome after the transplant is of good chances and will most likely add another 10 to 15 years of life. Next on our list we have Lisa. Lisa is a 12 year old young girl who desperately needs this transplant to live but her outcome is not as promising as Jerry’s, where as she is only anticipated to live no more than the age of 20. She’s very sick with other underlying issues. Its worth noting that her father renowned oncologist Dr. Doe along with his plea for the surgery of his daughter, states, that he…...

Similar Documents

Morality vs. Ethics

...Module One Essay Murder is wrong. One should always tell the truth. It is not right to steal. Most people would agree with the aforementioned phrases. However, what are they classified as? Do these expressions deal with morality, ethics, or both? Although these terms are often confused, morality and ethics are very distinct. On the surface this terminology may seem analogous, but their definitions are quite dissimilar. Morality and ethics are major components when examining the decision making of corporations. Despite having different meanings, morality and ethics are interrelated words that play a major part in business organizations. Morality The term morality deals with an individual or groups interpretation of what is right and wrong. In fact, it can be defined as the standards that a group or individual has about what is good and evil or right and wrong (Velasquez, 2006). Morals for the most part, are fairly unwavering within a group. The vast majority of people would agree that it is wrong or immoral to murder, steal, lie, or cheat. These are examples of moral standards. Moral standards are described as the types of behaviors or actions believed to be morally good or bad (Velasquez, 2006). There is also what is known as nonmoral standards. These principles judge what is good or bad in a nonmoral way such as good grammar or proper etiquette (Velasquez, 2006). In addition to understanding the meaning of morality, it is important to understand where......

Words: 1346 - Pages: 6

Compensating Kidney Donors

...of a transplant, but also opened the door to controversies such as organ sales. The first proposal to sell organs came from Virginia physician Dr. H. Barry Jacobs in 1983. He suggested that whoever could afford to buy a kidney should be allowed to do so. As a result of Dr. Jacobs’s proposal, Congress banned the sale of organs in 1984, and that law still exists today (Meckler A.1). Another change in organ donation happened in 1968, when the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act was introduced. This tried to increase the donor pool and make donating a person’s organs at his or her time of death easier. The act, however, did not raise the donation pool enough to keep up with the organ transplant waiting list (Fentiman 43). The waiting list is the topic of another controversy that has been occurring for several years and still exists today. Currently, there are 98,010 people on the waiting list, and 74,260 of those people are waiting for a kidney transplant (Alexander A1; “Paying Donors . . . ” 8A). Chelsea Lopez is one of those patients hoping to receive that life-saving donation. Chelsea Lopez was diagnosed with Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis, a disease that attacks the kidneys, at the young age of twelve-years-old. Leading a normal life is very difficult because the disease causes her to have high blood pressure, anemia, nausea, and extreme fatigue. She struggles to find a normal balance between frequent hospital visits and teenage activities. Chelsea, now eighteen, had to start......

Words: 2567 - Pages: 11

Becoming an Organ Donor

...BECOMING AN ORGAN DONOR By the time this day ends approximately eighteen people will have died needlessly. Not due to car crashes, gang violence or drug overdoses. Surprisingly they will have died from the simple act of waiting. They died while waiting for a much needed organ donation to replace their failing organ. For days, weeks even months they had hoped to receive news that somebody, somewhere had selflessly volunteered to donate their organs upon their death to another human being living on borrowed time. That news never came and time ran out. Perfectly good organs were buried with another non-donor who had no use for them anyhow because that person was already dead, yet without agreeing to give up their organs upon their death another life will be lost. Everyone can help to save lives by donating your vital organs after you have passed away. You will have no further need for them and I promise, you won’t even notice they are gone. How do you feel when you have to wait for something you really, really want? What if it was something you couldn’t live without? Nearly 80,000 Americans are waiting for a lifesaving organ transplant. Hundreds of thousands more would benefit from a life enhancing tissue transplant. Each day, averages of 75 people receive organ transplants. However, averages of 20 people die each day waiting for transplants that can't take place because of the shortage of donated organs. Every eleven minutes another name is added to an organ......

Words: 1581 - Pages: 7

Ethics vs, Profit: an Exploration of Accenture Development Partnership

...Abstract Accenture Development Partnerships (ADP) is a philanthropic arm of Accenture that supports an innovative not-for-profit business model as a means to channel the core business capabilities of Accenture to organizations in the international development sector. This article will give an overview of the offering, a look inside the industry where large corporations choose ethics over profit and will help the reader gain an understanding of what is necessary to successfully work within this group. . Ethics vs, Profit: An Exploration of Accenture Development Partnership My goal is clear; it has been for roughly five years now. When I left the not-for-profit sector and joined a Accenture, I did so with the very specific goal of returning with new and fine-tuned skills. As I sat in my New Joiner Orientation and learned about ADP, I knew that one day I would join Accenture Development Partnerships and once again work on projects that serve the greater good. I will channel the skills I have gained from my experience within a multi- national corporation, bring my non-for-profit sensibilities, expertise in development and fundraising to help advance sustainable solutions to global development challenges. Until joining Accenture, all of my adult work experience comes from the not-for-profit sector where I worked in very creative atmosphere within event management, fundraising and development.. After years......

Words: 1519 - Pages: 7

Organ Donor

...donation, you can help save the live of many people all over the world. One person who donates organs (hearts, lungs, liver, kidneys, pancreas and intestines) can save up to ten lives, while a tissue donor (corneas, bone, skin, heart valves, tendons, veins, etc.) can improve 12 or more lives by restoring eyesight, helping fight infections in burn patients and preventing the loss of mobility and disability. When asked if they would like to become organ donors, many people ask themselves "Why should I donate my organs? What are the benefits? " For many people the topic of organ donation can be a touchy one. Many people have religious beliefs against the practice, or apply to certain conspiracy theories that put forth horror stories about organs being taken from patients who would have otherwise survived. Despite these concerns, the fact Less than 50% of the patients who are on waiting lists for organs donated by donors will ever receive the organs they need to survive. Why ? Because there are not enough organs available only 50% of our nation's population sign up to donate their organs after they die. We still need a lot more donors. Every person who becomes an organ donor has the potential to save one or more of these people's lives. Over 1500 of the people waiting for organ donors every year are children much younger than you and me . Over half of these children will die before an organ becomes available for them. You could save these children's lives at not tangible......

Words: 651 - Pages: 3

Ethics and Sustainability Gm vs Nissan

...Introduction As the world’s population continues to grow and the middle class is on the rise, we have the issue and responsibility to grow in our ethical and sustainable practices in business. Conventional business models are no longer sustainable and as government regulations continue and the consumer speaks out against unsustainable and unethical practices, business will need to alter their goals toward a sustainable model. The main focus of business is of course profit but in order to make the profit, there needs to be standards that are in place to promote and sustain the consumer’s interest in ecology, ethics, and the economy. Specifically, business needs to be innovative and try to create their products with the minimal amount of environmental impact. In addition, the business needs to be liable for the ethical treatment of all employees including the employees of their suppliers and the sustainability of their suppliers. A company cannot claim to be sustainable and yet their suppliers are causing destruction to the environment or becoming wrapped up in ethical violations of their employees. The following will review the sustainability and ethical practices of two leading brands, General Motors (GM) and Nissan. General Motors is based out of Detroit, Michigan, and produces brands that include Chevrolet, Buick, GMC, Cadillac, and others. Nissan is headquartered in Nishi-ku, Yokohama, Japan. These two companies are fairly different in focus. General Motors......

Words: 2940 - Pages: 12

Deontological vs. Teleological Ethic

...Deontological vs. Teleological Ethics Law and Ethics for Health Professions HPR 106 Leslie Podeszwa Suppose you are working as a respiratory therapist and have been paged to the ICU (intensive care unit) to provide a breathing treatment for a patient. The patient is a 31 year old male who has been in a serious car accident and is suffering from a concussion, severe head and neck lacerations and several broken bones. He has just come out of an intensive surgical procedure and just now alert enough to receive your treatment. The nurse told you that his daughter and wife were killed in the accident and the decision has been made not to tell him about their deaths for ‘his own good’. The staff has agreed to tell him when he is more physically and mentally stable. As you walk into the patient’s room, he immediately asks you about his wife and daughter. 1. What do you say? a) From a Deontological standpoint, what do you say? Why? A Deontological theory states that at least some actions are right and wrong, therefore we have an obligation to perform them or refrain from performing them, without consideration of the consequences. This theory follows the belief that our actions should be universal which means that everyone would act the same way with the same set of circumstances. It would be difficult to decide what to say, because I would want to be told the truth but would also want the best end result. The patient will find out about their deaths whether I tell......

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5

Ethics vs Business

...- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ethics are very important to all business people. Yet, many neglect ethics as an important concept that has a major impact upon a person's success as an entrepreneur and investor. Consider something as simple as sales. Many would-be entrepreneurs actually hate the sales process, which is a serious disadvantage, given that generating sales is a company's most important activity. In Flying Solo: How To Start An Individual Practitioner Consulting Business, Stuart Walesh says new consultants often associate negative connotations with marketing. No doubt this comes from associating marketing and sales with pushy sales people who want to make a sale whether or not the sale is really in the customer's best interest. Walesh writes: "To the extent you learn to view marketing as earning trust and meeting client needs... you may conclude that not only is it an ethical process, but also a very satisfying and mutually beneficial one." Walesh divides consultant marketing into three parts--Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. Ethos means trust. Pathos means empathy and understanding. Logos means logic. To be successful in sales and marketing, Walesh emphasizes that you need the three in order. First, potential clients must trust you and your reputation. Lacking this, they won't hire you or your company for a job. Secondly, to adequately fulfill the client's needs, you must listen to the client and learn what......

Words: 915 - Pages: 4

Ache vs Ama Code of Ethics

...ACHE v. AMA Codes of Ethics ACHE v. AMA Codes of Ethics The American College of Healthcare Executives (ACHE) Code of Ethics is a list of principles set forth to guide healthcare executives in their daily practice. The Code of Ethics clearly defines the behavior and performance standards required by those performing the duties of healthcare executives. The ACHE Code of Ethics is designed in a way that clearly directs healthcare executives in their interactions with patients, employees, and the community. The ACHE Code of Ethics also clearly defines the responsibilities of the healthcare executive to the profession of healthcare management and also the responsibilities of the healthcare executive to the organization, as well as the responsibility of the healthcare executive to report violations of the code to the appropriate entities. The ACHE Code of Ethics is comprehensive and provides guidance for healthcare executives in the many facets of the profession. One of the areas of strength of the ACHE Code of Ethics is the focus on ensuring that there are adequate processes in places for nearly every area of patient care, including conflict resolution, safeguards to prevent discrimination, ensuring autonomy, ensuring confidentiality, and many others. Because the ACHE Code of Ethics outlines the importance of having these processes in place, it is vital that the healthcare executive ensure that these processes are in place so that he/she can be in compliance with the......

Words: 2386 - Pages: 10


...reasons for the continual growth of DonorsChoose, three major factors are: stimulating donor interest and securing contributions often repeated contributions from the same donors; arousing staffers’ motivation but doing so in a very cost effective manner; and maintaining uncompromising integrity. Stimulating Donor Interest and Securing Contributions People often become interested in DonorsChoose and subsequently become donors because they can support, in an affordable way, educational projects that resonate with them and they can be assured that their donations are making a meaningful difference. “People always have had the option of donating to education causes, but the real appeal of DonorsChoose is [the] projects’ narrow focus.”26 “put[s] donors squarely in charge and give[s] them plenty of options. The proposals are written by the teachers themselves, explaining the students’ needs and what kind of impact they expect from the project. Then donors are put in control: they pick the project they like the most. Finally, every donor gets a package of thank-you letters from students and pictures of the kids reading the donated books”27 or using the donated supplies or engaging in the supported activities. Many of these donations are of quite modest amounts yet taken together they fund projects that make an educational difference for many public school children. A donor “can pick a classroom project to fund with as little as $1, [and they can......

Words: 863 - Pages: 4

Ethics vs Profits

...The predicament to this is about business ethics versus profit. The first step in the situation is learning everything about the company. Being prepared for the presentation will give a lasting first impression on the potential client. Hopefully building credibility, trust, and making it seem as if you are well prepared will put the potential client at ease when breaking the bad news to them. The next situation that needs to be addressed is when and what manner will we be able to explain to the client on the approval. It is known that we do have a high probability that our product will become approved and we need to show our facts to the client. The client chose our firm not based on the pending regulatory act but on our other strengths. We need to show the potential client our strengths and exceptional guest services to get the peopl eon outside. As stated in the question, our company has yet to receive the approval for a project we are developing, which means we are producing something that is ahead of the game. No other company is doing what we are doing. The advantage that our product will the first of its kind will benefit both the client and our own. Through analytical and factual evidence, we can explain how our major competitors fail in what we are succeeding to. Explain to the client why and how the product will benefit the companies both the negative and the positive. A marketing strategy will be conducted to give...

Words: 723 - Pages: 3

Morals vs Ethics

...Morals VS Ethics Shelby Blaylock MGT/216 April 25, 2011 Dan Capps Morals Vs Ethics Morals define a person’s character, while ethics are stressed by a social system in which morals are applied. An individual’s “moral code” is usually unchanging while the ethics they practice can be questionable. Ethics point to standards or codes- moreover behavior that is expected of you. Morals consist of conduct that differs in intention and actions, while ethics addresses such questions as is this right or wrong, am I good or bad? What is the difference between moral and ethical issues? Moral issues are those that involve a specific kind of experience, i.e., a special kind of feeling. These feelings differ intuitively from other kinds of feelings such as religious or aesthetic feelings. (Some people think they arise from a conscience.) On this hypothesis, such feelings are a kind of satisfaction, shame, or guilt Sociopaths or psychopaths for example have no such feelings. | | | | "Antisocial personality: A personality disorder characterized by a basic lack of socialization and by behavior patterns that bring the individual repeatedly into conflict with society. People with this disorder are incapable of significant loyalty to individuals, groups, or social values and are grossly selfish, callous, irresponsible, impulsive, and unable to feel guilt or to learn from experience. Frustration tolerance is low. Such individuals tend to blame others or to offer plausible...

Words: 930 - Pages: 4

Organ Donor

...------------------------------------------------- Reasons to be an Organ Donor Nina Boswell/2A There are many reasons to become an organ donor. I will tell you three that I think are most important. Organ donors can save many lives. There is an organ shortage. You can give hope to those who need organs. Save lives Donating your organs you can save up to eight lives. You can give your tissue and organs to those who need it most. Hundreds of people are saved by people who choose to be an organ donor. When you die you have no need for your organs as they just go to waste so why not give them to someone who desperately needs them. Help save lives that have a chance to live. Give Hope When your organs are donated you give hope to the people who you give your donations to. They are very grateful that they may live on and have a new life to live to their fullest. They become a part of your family. Hope is what everyone needs while they wait on the appropriate organs for their needs. Although you may not have your organs another does and you give a second chance to those who never had a first. Organ Shortage There are thousands of people waiting to receive new organs but only hundreds get what they need. By donating you help with that shortage. You help give people what they need to live. About thirteen people are added to the waiting list and over eighteen die waiting for their organs. Help them get what they need. You could be the one to save...

Words: 351 - Pages: 2

Aid Donors

...Chapter 1-Introduction The motive of donor nations for administering foreign aid has unfolded over time. Over the past 100 years, foreign aid structures that began with European colonialism have become tied to shifting economic and political interests, as well as growing humanitarian movement (Phillips, 2013). This process began mainly after World War I when developed countries saw that less developed countries were in dire need of development assistance. Therefore, they started to aid these countries in order to catch-up on western countries by providing capital and the technological know-how needed. Since then there has been a shift of focus of aid donors from the original developmental aspects to politically influenced strategies. (Deaton, 2015) argued in his book The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality, that aid does not work, and that it can accelerate corruption and keep bad leaders in power. However, many prominent scholars viewed his work on aid puzzling and deemed inconclusive because of the different uses and impacts aid has on different recipient countries (Radelet, 2015). Although extensive research has been conducted in how aid is given and if aid works, little has been done to understand the motives and determinates behind donor countries; thus, how they motivate aid allocation. Guidelines are drawn up by the donor country to ensure that the funds are used accordingly but governments generally give foreign aid for three main purposes;......

Words: 294 - Pages: 2

Character Ethic vs Personality Ethic

...fascinate human beings no matter in past or nowadays. There have been two dominant theories of achieving success in the literature of the past hundreds years, the personality ethic and the character ethic. It is used to be widely acknowledged that the character ethic is the foundation of success. However, as times have changed, personality ethic has become increasingly popular. According to Noah St. John, the driving force behind success shifted from a character-based and principal-driven ethic to a personality-based ethic. From my perspective, both character and personality ethic play an indispensable role in success pursuing. Working on personality without improving character is neither productive nor effective. Although nowadays the increasing number of people, as well as organizations, tend to pay more attention on individual’s personality, it is still worth noting the importance of character and realizing the profound meaning of success. The character ethic is based on attributes such as integrity, fidelity, courage, compassion, contribution, responsibility and justice. It seems that as long as people say and do the right things and package themselves in the right ways, they will be more likely to gain the results they want (Bloodgood, Tuenley, & Mudrack, 2008). In contrast, the personality ethic concentrates more on techniques than on principles. These techniques basically deal with how to take care of themselves, such as, how to look good, how to dress in......

Words: 1307 - Pages: 6

Mac OSX Lion For Common PC Niresh12495 Fixed Kexts Hacint | CANUGIVEMEMODSPLEASE | Pierre Lapin