Descartes’ Discourse on the Method

In: Other Topics

Submitted By monarenee
Words 788
Pages 4
Descartes’ Discourse on the Method (Part IV)

Descartes’ Discourse on the Method

In Descartes’ Discourse on the Method, Descartes tries to explain his existence by the science of reasoning. His research led him to traveling to many countries around the world to observe how other cultures lived. He did this to remove himself from the teachings and opinions of others in which he had been assimilated as he seeks the explanation of the existence of man. Descartes’ decided to leave school and rely on his own knowledge of life and study the tapestry of the world as his classroom. He travels the world searching for the truth and theoretical reasoning regarding how men came upon their existence. He rejected the scholars’ reasoning and rational on varies matters and chose the layman’s rationalization.

However, Descartes’ thoughts on Theology puzzled him. He could not explain why a person with less intelligence than himself had as much of a chance to go to heaven as he did. This he felt could only be explained through a higher power, not a mere man like himself (It appears that God enlightened him). He felt that he lacked the intellect to pursue this matter with certainty. Descartes had an epiphany while in Germany. He was sitting alone in a room with no-one other than his own thoughts, and he realized one’s own thoughts and logic could lead to truth and freedom to live life in all of its prosperity. In short he utilized the method of doubt to doubt everything that he could about life except for God. This became evident with his theory and concerns about who could make it into heaven.

In Descartes’ first principle “I am thinking, therefore I exist” there is an uncertainty of that statement which raise more questions on whether our conscience mental state of doubting is indeed rational. Descartes’ grasp the concept of the…...

Similar Documents

Descartes

...Philosophy Essay: ‘Outline the background to Descartes’ use of the Method of Doubt’ The 17th century; this was a period of time in which an intellectual movement of reason and science began. This movement was known as the Age of Enlightenment. Sparked by philosophers, many began approach an understanding of our world by a means of adopt both rational and empirical methods. Research in this area lead to a multitude of discoveries such as; Johannes Kepler’s law of planetary motion, the speed of light and Newton’s laws of motion and universal gravitation. Such discoveries as these lead to an arising in both mechanical philosophy and materialism; beliefs that together state that the universe is analogised best as a machine in which both organic and inorganic have no intrinsic relationship to one another, but are rather just subject to the laws of nature. The increase of people holding such beliefs lead to an increasing doubt in the existence of God, and encouragement of atheism. This was a serious problem as the Catholic church very much impinged on every aspect of life. Any person who publically held a belief which conflicted with Catholicism was charged with heresy and punished. An example of this being Galileo, who was charged with heresy and sentenced to house arrest for asserting that the Copernican view of the universe was wrong, and that everything didn’t revolve around the Earth. Due to cases like this, the church restricted the range of scientific knowledge to a...

Words: 496 - Pages: 2

Descartes Thoughts

...A Companion to Descartes Edited by Janet Broughton John Carriero Blackwell Publishing A Companion to Descartes Blackwell Companions to Philosophy This outstanding student reference series offers a comprehensive and authoritative survey of philosophy as a whole. Written by today’s leading philosophers, each volume provides lucid and engaging coverage of the key fi gures, terms, topics, and problems of the fi eld. Taken together, the volumes provide the ideal basis for course use, representing an unparalleled work of reference for students and specialists alike. Already published in the series: 1. The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy, Second Edition Edited by Nicholas Bunnin and Eric Tsui-James 2. A Companion to Ethics Edited by Peter Singer 3. A Companion to Aesthetics Edited by David Cooper 4. A Companion to Epistemology Edited by Jonathan Dancy and Ernest Sosa 5. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy (2 Volume Set), Second Edition Edited by Robert E. Goodin and Philip Pettit 6. A Companion to Philosophy of Mind Edited by Samuel Guttenplan 7. A Companion to Metaphysics Edited by Jaegwon Kim and Ernest Sosa 8. A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory Edited by Dennis Patterson 9. A Companion to Philosophy of Religion Edited by Philip L. Quinn and Charles Taliaferro 10. A Companion to the Philosophy of Language Edited by Bob Hale and Crispin Wright 11. A Companion to World Philosophies Edited by Eliot Deutsch and Ron......

Words: 304088 - Pages: 1217

Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting One’s

...Discourse on the Method of Rightly Conducting one’s Reason and Seeking Truth in the Sciences “A Personal Analysis World Cultures – HUM 112 November 11, 2012 In analysis of the Discourse on the Method, I come to realize Descartes thought pattern was a simple yet complex one in the beginning. He basically took the thoughts of others and put them into a reality that coincided with his own so people would have a better understanding of the things and/or situations of this life. Descartes’s thoughts in my opinion are like a non-believer of God and His word at some point in life and then entering into the fullness and knowledge of the faith and seeking to live a Christian life after receiving knowledge of God and His redeeming power. He at the end starting to realize and offer the reader a gift and an answer to what living life is all about, “God.” I felt it was a bit hard to understand his point of view in the beginning of the passage because he was speaking of the existence of life on one’s own and not by God the creator of life. It was as though he was saying he created himself and there was no God to create creation or life; that the existence of life was natural and a part of an earthly way of life. For an unbeliever it is hard to understand what to believe at first because of the notion that people place on the table that God is good and he has, is, and will always do great things for His people, yet no one has seen him face to face. Descartes offers us reasons...

Words: 382 - Pages: 2

Aristotle and Descartes

...Two Views of Soul: Aristotle and Descartes* THEODORE TRACY, SJ. What first attracted my interest to a possible comparison was the realization that, unlike Plato, both Aristotle and Descartes shared the view that, first, there is but a single soul and, second, that this soul operates principally through a single specific bodily organ. Given his own understanding, I believe Descartes could agree totally with Aristotle's statement that the soul's "essential nature cannot be * This paper was originally presented at the University of South Carolina in April 1981' as a contribution to a symposium on "Soul and Mind in Ancient Philosophy," organized by Professor Rosamond Kent Sprague. 248 Illinois Classical Studies, XI corporeal; yet it is also clear that soul is present in a particular bodily part, and this one of the parts having control over the rest":' dfiXou 6ri ovx oihv r' tivai adua rffv ovtriau ocvrfiq, aW 5fi(t)c, Sri 7' iv tlvl tov (TUifiaToq inrapxii^ nopiw (t>avtpbv, kcu iv tovtw tivi twv ixovruiv bvvafiiv eV roJq nopioic,. {Parva Naturalia 467b 13- 16) For Aristotle, as we know, that particular controlling organ is the heart. In his treatise On Memory, for example, Aristotle declares that in animals, including man, "the source and control center {otpxvY of both the sensitive and nutritive soul must be in the heart": apayKT) Koi rrfc, ataQr]TiKr\c, kou rriq dpeirTLKfic, ^vxri<i ^v ry Kapb'ux rffv otpxw etW. {PN 469a5-7) Again, in the De......

Words: 8048 - Pages: 33

Descartes' Surprise Ending

...The discourse on Method was written in the 17th century during what is now known as the scientific revolution. During this time people were beginning to question the old way of thinking, based on Medieval Aristotelianism in light of the new way of thinking, based more on science. The Medieval way of thinking was based mostly on Catholicism and the belief in God. In the text author René Descartes, expresses his doubts and concerns about beliefs based on Catholocism. Other philosophers such as Galileo, who had ideas similar to Descartes’, were condemned for the publication on their beliefs. For this reason Descartes decided not to publish The discourse on Method until years later.  In part IV of The discourse on Method Descartes desperately searches for a explanation of the things that we believe to be “unquestionably true”. He decides that the best was to do so was to disregard not regard these things as “unquestionably false” instead. He went as far as to pretend that his body did not exist and that averting that he had ever taught of was nothing more than a mere dream and did not exist in real life. Before he could even begin to imagine his non-existence, it occurred to him that fact that he could even think that everything was false proved that he existed. He stated “But no sooner had I embarked on this project than I noticed that while I was trying in this way to think everything to be false it had to be the case that  I, who was thinking this, was something.” From this...

Words: 379 - Pages: 2

A Discourse on the Discourse

...Cesar Paulo S. Castor V 9/27/2013 Ph100 A Discourse on the Discourse In A Discourse on the Method, Descartes talk of his desire for certainty and truth and the method he uses to determine truth and falsity. The text shows Descartes method of making certain the knowledge he obtains and he does not limit this to philosophical knowledge he uses his method in seeking all forms of truth be it the sciences, theology or philosophy. Throughout the text Descartes talks of the importance of certainty and truth and begins by stating that the ability to distinguish what is true and false, or “good sense” as Descartes called it, is not a talent inherent to a few chosen intellectuals who received education but as something that everyone possesses and can develop. He backs this up by making an account of his years studying in both the literature of the ancients and the sciences and despite all his studying ended up realizing that he was still had doubts about what he had learned. He realized that knowledge and certainty could not be gained from books alone because some wrote not to find truth but to make ideas plausible and to Descartes anything that was tantamount to plausible was the same as false. (Descartes 2006, 10) What was important to Descartes for discerning true from false was not book smarts but more on life experience and exposure to different opinions. The method he uses to find certainty is something that uses discernment from one’s own reason to make it......

Words: 1501 - Pages: 7

Descartes

...Descartes and Rationalism René Descartes, 1596-1650 (Latin Renatus Cartesius, hence the term Cartesian) Descartes’ Project Descartes was a contemporary of Galileo and Kepler. He was born about 50 years after the publication of Copernicus’ De Revolutionibus. Thus he lived right at the beginning of the scientific revolution, as the medieval world view was beginning to collapse. Descartes was a mathematician and physicist, as well as a philosopher. He was the first to offer a system of mechanics that applied both to terrestrial and heavenly bodies. His system was based on a set of laws governing the motions of particles, including various types of collisions. These laws, though unsuccessful, were a precursor of Newton’s laws of motion, and Huygens’ solution to the collision problem. Descartes had the disturbing experience of finding out that everything he learned at school was wrong. From 1604-1612 he was educated at a Jesuit school, where he learned the standard medieval, scholastic, Aristotelian philosophy. In 1619 he had some disturbing dreams, and embarked on his life’s work of rebuilding the whole universe, since the Aristotelian universe was doomed. (Descartes didn’t suffer from lack of ambition!) The problem for Descartes was that he couldn’t merely tinker with the medieval picture, fixing it up here and there, because it was fundamentally wrong. It was rotten to its very foundations. The only way to proceed was to tear it down completely, and start building again from......

Words: 2471 - Pages: 10

Descartes' Life and Works

...Lecture 9/23 – Background to Descartes I. Introduction: Descartes’ Life and Works A. Descartes (1596-1650) 1. Born in La Haye, France in 1596. 2. 1606 – 1614 Descartes studies at the Jesuit University of La Fleche where his philosophical education would have focused on Aquinas and Aristotle – the dominant world view at the time. 3. 1616 – Received his law license. 4. 1637 – Discourse on Method 5. 1641 – Meditations on First Philosophy 6. 1644 – Principles of Philosophy 7. 1649 – Descartes moves to Sweden and tutors Queen Christina. 8. 1650 – Dies in Sweden in 1650. B. Descartes revolutionizes philosophy in two main ways. 1. In terms of epistemology, Descartes explores important issues via the first person point of view. He asks, “What can I from my own subjective point of view know about myself and the world around me.” This approach dominates philosophy after Descartes. 2. Descartes will also transform the way in which we think about substance. C. Descartes is a pivotal figure in the history of ideas since he writes at a time when the world is changing in important ways. The Meditations is a much discussed work. 1. Renaissance (1350-1550) 2. Reformation (Beginning in the First Half of the Sixteenth......

Words: 1427 - Pages: 6

Discourse

...Photograph retouching by Chris Riger. Frontispiece photograph of Meher Baba, Ahmednagar, 1945. Copyright © Lawrence Reiter. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. by Sheriar Press, Inc. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording, or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher, except by a reviewer who wishes to quote brief passages in connection with a review written for inclusion in a magazine, newspaper, or broadcast. For information write: Sheriar Foundation, 3005 Highway 17 North ByPass, Myrtle Beach, South Carolina 29577, U.S.A. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data: Meher Baba, 1894-1969. Discourses / Meher Baba. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-880619-08-3 : $25.00. - ISBN 1-880619-09-1 (pbk.): $15.00. 1. Spiritual life. I. Title. BP610.M43127 1995 299'.93-dc20 94-36972 CIP ISBN 1^880619-08-3 (previously ISBN 0-913078-573) ISBN 1-880619-09-1 (pbk.) (previously ISBN 0913078-584) ________________________________________________ v Contents FOREWORD ……………………………………………………. INTRODUCTION TO THE SEVENTH EDITION ………………......... THE SEVEN REALITIES …………………………………………. THE NEW HUMANITY ………………………………………….. SELFISHNESS ………………………………………………….. GOD AND THE INDIVIDUAL ……………………………………. THE BEGINNING AND THE END OF CREATION ………………….. THE FORMATION AND FUNCTION OF SANSKARAS ……………… THE REMOVAL OF......

Words: 48675 - Pages: 195

Descartes Mind and Body

...Descartes’ Mind Body Dualism Rene Descartes’ main purpose is to attempt to prove that the mind that is the soul or the thinking thing is distinct and is separate from the body. This thinking thing was the core of himself, which doubts, believes, reasons, feels and thinks. Descartes considers the body to be an extended unthinking thing; therefore it is possible that one may exist without the other. This view is known as mind-body dualism. He believes that what he is thinking in his mind is what God created and instilled in him. Descartes outlines many arguments to support and prove his claims of his discoveries. He states that because he can think, his mind exists. This is known as the Cogito, which is the first existential principal of all of Descartes’ work where modern philosophy begins. Descartes also explains that it is possible that all knowledge of external objects, including his body could be false because of the deceiving actions of an evil genius. The evil genius could make him contemplate his existence of his nature as a thinking thing. Descartes further explains in his arguments, even physical objects, such as the body, are better and more distinctly known through the mind than through the body. Descartes shows this through his example of The Wax Argument, where solid wax transitions into liquid state. With all of this in mind, Descartes theories suggest the mind and body can exist separately but it can be argued, the mind needs the body in order to think and......

Words: 1480 - Pages: 6

Humanities 112 Assignment 1 Descartes Discourse on the Method (Part Iv)

...Descartes’ Discourse on the Method (Part IV) Vernon McDaniel Strayer University Humanities 112 Dr. Jane El-Yacoubi April 7, 2015 After reading Discourse on the Method (Part IV) it becomes clear that Descartes begins with a proof of one basic conclusion and ends with a proof of something much grander. In other words, Descartes claims that in practical life it is pretty much common for people to make erroneous judgments, conclusions or infer from erroneous perceptions. Therefore, Descartes now wants to devote himself “solely to the search for truth” (Discourse on the Method, Part IV, p.14). In order to achieve this end, Descartes claims: “I thought I needed to do the exact opposite—to reject as if it were absolutely false everything regarding which I could imagine the least doubt, so as to see whether this left me with anything entirely indubitable to believe.” So, the one basic conclusion for Descartes is “one sometimes has to act on opinions that one knows to be quite uncertain just as if they were unquestionably true” (Discourse on Method, Part IV). He offers several proofs for this basic conclusion based on his method of doubting everything so as to reach a conclusion on that which is indubitable or cannot be absolutely doubted. So, he rejects he evidentiary value of senses He also rejects deductive arguments because logical fallacies are common and people tend to reason erroneously. He rejects the evidence of......

Words: 463 - Pages: 2

Descartes Fact File

...DESCARTES: Information: Born in France in 1596 Got an education at the hands of the Jesuits, which included maths and philosophy. He took his law degree at the university of Pioters, in his hometown. He became obsessed by the question whether there was anything we could be sure of, anything we could know for certain. Key Works: Discourse on method – published in 1634 Meditations – published in 1641 Key Terms: “I think therefore I am” “Common sense is the best distributed commodity in the world, for every man is conceived he is well supplied with it” Important arguments: The argument for universal doubt: All doubt comes from our senses. Everything is open to doubt. * We do not know that external objects exist. * Senses put us with mental images of external objects so perception cant bring us any certainty The dream argument: * Often we have perceptions, which are similar to ones that are in our dreams. * There are no definite signs to distinguish dream experiences from an actual one. * It is possible that we are dreaming now and all our perceptions are false. The deceiving God argument: * God has it in his powers to deceive us about our knowledge. * We think we have a high knowledge of maths that helps us understand the world. * It is possible that we are deceived even in our mathematical knowledge of the basic structure of the world. The evil demon argument: * Instead of assuming......

Words: 355 - Pages: 2

Rene Descartes

...Rene Descartes Metaphysics, Epistemology, and Value Theory Asma Naheed Introduction to Philosophy Mr. Ferguson 13 May 2016 Rene Descartes (1596-1650) was a very important philosopher in the 17th century. Many regard to Descartes as the father of modern philosopher. His famous statement "Cogito ero sum" is widely known and studied. He contributed much to mathematics as well as philosophy. What does my philosopher believe is real? One thing my philosopher believes is real is the certainty of the existence of god. René Descartes has an awareness about god. And acknowledges the existence of god. One of Descartes metaphysics is his certainty about god which is examined in his Fifth Mediations “Descartes holds that the idea of God is a true and immutable nature and hence it is not something that can be rejected at all in so far as it is ultimately an innate idea”. His view is similar like mine regarding the belief of god. Though his process for believing in god is quite different then of mine, we both have a strong belief in god. My View on Rene Descartes metaphysics regarding the existence of god is disagreement. Descartes argues that god exists beyond any doubt, but I disagree. My view is not like his because, I believe his proof of good relies mostly on false premises. Descartes argues that god exists but what is the actuality of god he does not answer. An example of this can be illustrated by a student doubting whether or not they will make a good grade on the...

Words: 1980 - Pages: 8

Rene Descartes

...RENE DESCARTES’ METHODS OF DOUBT Introduction The theory of knowledge and analytical method advanced by the French philosopher Rene Descartes is often summed up in the famous phrase, Cogito ergo sum- “I think, therefore I am.” While this phrase does express the final step in his systematic process of “doubting everything,” it is a gross over-simplification of Descartes’ methods. Descartes did use systematic doubt to find the starting point for his theory of knowledge, but his other philosophical inquiries involved several different methods of doubting, from simply imagining that which is contradictory, to carrying logical postulates to absurd conclusions, to the more traditional methods of testing syllogisms and analyzing proofs. In this essay, I will examine Rene Descartes’ various methods of doubt, to show that the philosopher did not rely on the single reductio ad absurdum in his famous proof of his own existence. Descartes, as we will see, employed several different approaches to philosophical proofs, and he was not the mechanistic logician that his mathematical background might suggest. It will be the argument of this essay that Descartes applied different methods of doubt to different problems, depending upon whether the problem was epistemological, scientific or theological in nature. Existential Doubt: Do I Exist? The first and best-known method of doubt employed by Descartes involves reductionism, in the sense that he used a negative or reverse logical......

Words: 2190 - Pages: 9

Philosophy Descartes

...Descartes' Methodic Doubt René Descartes (1596-1650) is an example of a rationalist. According to Descartes, before we can describe the nature of reality (as is done in metaphysics) or say what it means for something to be or exist (which is the focus of ontology), we must first consider what we mean when we say we know what reality, being, or existence is. He suggests that it is pointless to claim that something is real or exists unless we first know how such a claim could be known as a justified true belief. But to say that our beliefs are justified, we have to be able to base them ultimately on a belief that is itself indubitable. Such a belief could then provide a firm foundation on which all subsequent beliefs are grounded and could thus be known as true. This way of thinking about knowledge is called foundationalism. In his Meditations on First Philosophy (1641), Descartes indicates how we are able to guarantee our beliefs about reality by limiting what we believe to what is indubitable or is based on what is indubitable. That involves him in a series of six "meditations" (of which we will focus on only the first two) about the proper method of philosophical reflection and the conclusions that can be drawn from using that method. Throughout these Meditations Descartes insists that (1) we should claim to know only that for which we have justification, (2) we cannot appeal to anything outside of our ideas for such justification, and (3) we judge our ideas using a......

Words: 1949 - Pages: 8

حلقة 1 اوفا Yuragi-sou no Yuuna-san الحلقة 1 2018 HDTv اوفا Yuragi-sou no Yuuna-san الحلقة 1 انيميشن مشاهدة وتحميل اوفا انمي الكوميديا Yuuna of Yuragi Manor 2018 HD مترجم اون لاين وتحميل مباشر | Moonshiners S08E01 | Watch movie