Criminal Evidence

In: Other Topics

Submitted By policechick11
Words 1198
Pages 5
Understand how to install Fedora Core Linux on x86 processor machines. Understand how to perform a custom Linux installation. Understand how to use the text book and lab notes to determine hardware and software installation requirements. Understand how to select, activate, load, and troubleshoot system options and parameters. Understand how to use the Disk Druid graphical tool to create and format hard drive partitions.

You have been asked to install Fedora 13.

You are doing this remotely, so the text based Red Hat installer will be used.

Lab Diagram
During your session you will have access to the following lab configuration.

Connecting to your lab
In this module you will be working on the following equipment to carry out the steps defined in each exercise.  PLABWINBUILD (Build Server)

Each exercise will detail which console you are required to work on to carry out the steps.

To start simply click on the named Server from the device list (located on the left hand side of the screen) and click the Power on from the in tools bar. In some cases the devices may power on automatically. During the boot up process an activity indicator will be displayed in the name tab:    Black - Powered Off Orange - Working on your request Green - Ready to access

If the remote console is not displayed automatically in the main window (or popup) click the Connect icon located in the tools bar to start your session. If the remote console does not appear please try the following option:  Switch between the HTML 5 and Java client versions in the tools bar.

In the event this does not resolve your connectivity problems please visit our Help / Support pages for additional resolution options.

Copyright Notice
This document and its content is copyright of Practice-IT - © Practice-IT 2013. All rights reserved. Any…...

Similar Documents

Police Evidence

... Evidence-Based Policing Introduction to Criminal Justice Evidence-Based Policing According to our text book criminal investigation is “the process of discovering, collecting, preparing, identifying, and presenting evidence to determine what happened and who responsible” when a crime occurs. ( Schmalleger 2010). Now in this process the case belongs to the detective in charge, but any officer can be involve in the preliminary investigation by securing the initial crime scene and evidence. Evidence- based policing is when police based their decision about a case by following the path of observation determined by the evidence; hence the name evidence based policing. This practice was derived from medicine when it resolves that the method use in medical practice can apply by the police force to achieve a scientific result. Police agency accreditation can come under great scrutiny from different angle for instance the public who feel a decision might be wrong, the prosecution office involving the case etc; this is why evidence is vital to case decision. Disadvantage of evidence base policing is that policies and procedures will only be as good as research itself. In some cases researchers may not be sufficient in their theory and data collecting which will alter the final result, and even many officers may not be sufficiently versed in research method to execute the proper strategies. In result only the strictest and comprehensive studies should be adopt by the processing......

Words: 564 - Pages: 3

Admissible Evidence

...[pic] Criminal Justice Procedures CJ227-1 Case Study of Officer Smith [pic] Officer Smith was on patrol and notices a vehicle that fits the general description of a suspected car in a recent roadside killing of a fellow police officer. In this paper I will discuss the actions taken by Officer Smith and if she had legal justification for her actions and if evidence found is admissible in the court of law. Officer Smith was on her routine patrol when she noticed the vehicle in front of her had what appeared to be a broken tail light fixed with colored tape as she directed the driver of the vehicle to pullover she remembered a vehicle of the same make and model which was involved in the murder of a fellow police officer. Officer Smith had reasonable suspicion to pull the vehicle over due to the fact that she thought the taillight was broken and covered with tape. Reasonable suspicion is defined as specific facts that can be articulated to a court and shows that criminal activity is occurring, is about to occur, or has recently occurred and that the vehicle or a person in the vehicle is connected with that criminal activity ( Robertson, Wallace, Stuckey, 2007, pg. 84). The broken taillight would fall under an equipment violation giving Officer Smith reasonable suspicion to pull the vehicle over. Next, Officer Smith asked the driver of the vehicle to step out for a pat down. A Terry Stop is defined as reasonable suspicion supported by articulable facts that......

Words: 914 - Pages: 4


...Rule. The exclusionary rule mandates that evidence obtained from an illegal arrest, unreasonable search, or coercive interrogation must be excluded from trial. Under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine, evidence is also excluded from trial if it was gained through evidence uncovered in an illegal arrest, unreasonable search, or coercive interrogation. Like the exclusionary rule, the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine was established primarily to deter law enforcement from violating rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.(Legal Dictionary, 2008) The name fruit of the poisonous tree is thus a metaphor: the poisonous tree is evidence seized in an illegal arrest, search, or interrogation by law enforcement. The fruit of this poisonous tree is evidence later discovered because of knowledge gained from the first illegal search, arrest, or interrogation. The poisonous tree and the fruit are both excluded from a criminal trial.(Legal Dictionary, 2008) That being stated, then no the Supreme Court should not hold up his conviction, they should actually over turn it. Also this would open up to double jeopardy as well if they tried the try him again for the same crime. Should the womans in court identification hold up? No not at all had Crain actually een arrested the correct way this could have been different and may have held up in court. The problem is the start of this case was wrong and any and all evidence collected is not allowed to be used in......

Words: 1090 - Pages: 5

Cj305-01: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence

...Expert Witness Requirement’s- The Frye and Daubert Test’s CJ305-01: Legal Foundations of Criminal Evidence Sigrid Hess June 3, 2013 Expert Witness Requirements This article will briefly review the applicable standards of the admission and exclusion of expert testimony in the Federal Court. The guidelines discussed in this article, principally pertain to the subject of the reliability of the methodology supporting the submitting of evidence. In addition, the qualifications of the proposed experts in the pertinent field of expertise, and the relevancy of evidence from expert’s .These areas also offer opportunities for confronting the opponent’s case by excluding the evidence on the grounds of; lack of expert qualification of the witness or the lack of relevance of the testimony to the facts of Court Cases. I. Discuss the Frye and Daubert tests Frye Test: Frye v. United States was a case in 1923 U.S. v. Frye, 54 App.D.C. 46, 293 F. 1013 C.A.D.C 1923. Retrieved from: , in which James Frye was tried for murder and in his defense he produced the testimony of an expert with the result of a blood pressure test, in the expectation to prove that he was speaking the truth when he did not accept his guilt. This deception test was intended to tell if a person is being dishonest or not. This case became a standard for judges while allowing admissibility of testimony of experts based upon scientific methods. Frye test is also referred to as Frye standard or......

Words: 1817 - Pages: 8

Evidence Tracking

...Evidence Tracking Properly handling evidence is critical to crime solving, improper deviations to the handling can make it impossible to prosecute using the evidence collected. This paper will outline will track the evidence from a chosen crime scene through all the proper handling processes. This paper will describe the chosen crime scene scenario, describe the collected evidence and proper collection, recording of the evidence, chain of evidence, processing, interpretation methods, preservation of the evidence, proper presentation methods for different types of evidence, and the consequences of mishandling the evidence collected. The Crime and Processing Protocols The chosen crime scene scenario is a sexual assault; the first responding officer will have been notified of a possible rape and traveled to an apartment complex at 306 Timber Road, Apartment 12-B to investigate. Upon arrival, the first crime scene procedure is to make sure the crime scene is safe and the possible offender has been arrested or is no longer on the scene. If the struggle were still occurring, this would be the point to render aid. The next procedure would be to determine the extent of the crime and to secure the scene from intrusion to preserve any evidence. It is important for the responding officer to keep their superiors informed of their activities. At this point the responding officer will touch nothing and document all of their observations and actions, if the scene had been disturbed in......

Words: 1515 - Pages: 7


...judicial character. For example, in Berryman v Wise , it was held that an attorney need not prove by his certificate or by a roll of attorneys that he was an attorney. Proof that he acted as such was held sufficient. Again, in R v Roberts it was held that the presumption applied to a deputy judge of county court and in Dillon v R that it applied to a policeman. (b) Presumption of innocence . The presumption of law as to innocence not only applies to criminal charges but also cases where an allegation of criminality is made. (c) Presumption as to continuance . It is presumed that things or circumstances once proved to have existed at a certain time must continue to exist in that state for a reasonable time. This presumption is not sufficient to support a claim that a person was alive at a particular time as in R v Lumley where the accused, a woman, was tried for bigamy. It was proved that the woman married A in 1836, left him in 1843, and married another man in 1847. Nothing was heard of A after the accused left him, nor was any evidence given of his age, but the judge, holding that there was a presumption of law that A was alive at the date of the second marriage, withdrew the case from the jury and directed them to return a verdict of guilty. It was upheld by the Court of Crown Cases Reserved that there was no presumption of law either in favour, or against, the continuance of A's life up to 1847. The conviction was quashed. (d) Presumption of death . There is a......

Words: 3324 - Pages: 14


...Case 1 The court ruled the State failed to show that the items seized were the same items tested because the description of the items by the chemist did not match exactly the description given by the arresting officer. The court also held the State did not establish proof of handling, delivery, presence and safekeeping, which were necessary to establishing chain of custody. To avoid this result the police should always properly document the evidence and who has control of the evidence by using badge numbers and names on the forms provided for the evidence. Case 4 The defendant did intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly cause bodily injury to Shelby Hooper by biting her.At trial, the State introduced evidence that the police were dispatched to a hotel room that had recently been the scene of an altercation between appellant and Hooper.   Hysterical and crying, Hooper told the officers that appellant had struck her with his fists and bitten her.   Consistent with Hooper's statements, officers observed a cut on her lip and bite marks on her back and buttocks.   After admitting, during questioning, that he had hit Hooper in the head with a closed fist, appellant was arrested. Hooper testified for the defense. She stated that she had provided the police with a misleading picture of what really occurred on the evening of the alleged assault. With regard to the allegation that appellant hit her with his hand, she claimed that she was the aggressor that evening and that......

Words: 308 - Pages: 2


...Please allow me 24 hours to answer your emails excluding weekends and holidays. If I do not answer in 24 hours, please email me again. Class Schedule: The traditional class meets on Monday/Wednesday 5:15 pm to 7:45 pm Course Prerequisites: NONE Course Description: This course examines the nature, location, and impact of crime in the United States by exploring a broad range of issues related to criminology. Topics focused on within the course include the historical foundations of crime, the theoretical underpinnings of criminality, how we measure criminal acts, the development of criminal careers, the various typologies of offenders and victims, and a critical analysis of public policies concerning crime control in society. Required Course Materials: Schmalleger, F. (2015). Criminology Today. (7th Edition). Prentice Hall Publisher. ISBN: 0137074859 Mission Statement Campbell University The mission of Campbell University is to graduate students with exemplary academic and professional skills who are prepared for purposeful lives and meaningful service. The University is informed and inspired by its Baptist heritage and three basic theological and biblical presuppositions: learning is appointed and conserved by God as essential to the fulfillment of human destiny; in Christ all things consist and find ultimate unity; and the Kingdom of God in this world is rooted and grounded in Christian community. The University embraces the conviction that there......

Words: 3318 - Pages: 14


...preliminary hearing -Arraignment and the plea -Plea bargaining 2. The primary purpose of a criminal trial is to determine the defendant’s guilt or innocence. Factual guilt deals with the issue of whether the defendant is actually responsible for the crime for which he or she is charged. Legal guilt is established when the prosecutor presents evidence to convince the judge or jury that the defendant is guilty as charged. The adversarial system allows for two sides; one advocates for the state and the other for the defendant. 3.• Trial initiation. It is important to note that there are time limitations on the processing of cases. • Jury selection. Jury members are selected from the public for jury duty. Prosecuting and defense attorneys question (voir dire) prospective jury members and eliminate them by making peremptory and for-cause challenges. • Opening statements. Opening statements begin the presentation of information to the jury. Opening statements provide an opportunity for the prosecution and defense to describe what they intend to prove. • Presentation of evidence. The state presents its evidence, and then the defense follows. Evidence presented includes direct, circumstantial, real, and hearsay. • Closing arguments. Closing arguments are an oral summation of the case. • Judge’s charge to the jury. The judge instructs the jury about the evidence presented and matters of law, and describes the deliberation process. • Jury......

Words: 252 - Pages: 2


...Evidence October 2007 Brief 6 of 6 issue brief In February 2007, AcademyHealth conducted a meeting on behalf of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation examining the role of consumer engagement in improving the quality of health care. In preparation for this meeting, five papers were commissioned on the following subjects: consumer activation, consumer choice of health plan and provider, consumer choice of treatment, patient navigation, and the appropriate role for consumers. This issue brief is based on the consumer choice of health plans and providers paper, which was authored by Jonathan Kolstad and Michael Chernew, Ph.D. Consumer Choice in the Health Insurance and Provider Markets: A Look at the Evidence Thus Far may or may not be evidence-based. Because consumer choice of health plans and providers drives cost and quality outcomes, consumers are being asked to make use of these formally reported data as they assume greater responsibility for their health and health care decisions. Despite the momentum in this area, it is not easy for consumers to make evidencebased decisions about their health plans and providers. There are several reasons for this. First, there is a relative dearth of information on quality. Second, choosing between health plans is not as simple as it once was because there is no one-size-fits-all or “right” answer. Third, out-of-pocket costs are increasingly a factor. Consumers are also at a distinct information disadvantage when it comes......

Words: 2269 - Pages: 10

Discuss Eysenck’s Theory of Criminal Personality – Refer to Evidence in Your Answer (12 Marks)

...The term ‘personality’ is generally used to refer to relatively stable characteristics of a person that make their behaviour consistent across situations (but many other definitions are possible, depending on the approach being taken). Hans Eysenck (1964) put forward a theory of criminal behaviour based on a very influential theory of personality he had earlier devised. Although this theory is usually referred to as a personality theory of offending, it is important to appreciate that Eysenck’s theory conceives of criminal behaviour as the outcome of interactions between processes occurring at several different levels of explanation. Eysenck’s theory suggests that crime arises from certain personality traits, which are biological in origin. Eysenck originally argued that the great variation between people’s personalities could be reduced to just two dimensions, which related to the underlying functioning of the individual’s nervous system. A person’s level of extraversion (E), neuroticism (N) can be measured using simple questionnaires such as the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (EPQ). People with High E scores are sociable, active, lively and sensation seeking. Extraversion is determined by the overall level of arousal in the person’s Central Nervous System and Autonomic Nervous System. High E-scorers have a low level of arousal and therefore need more stimulation from their environment. People with high Neuroticism scores are anxious, depressed and react very strongly......

Words: 629 - Pages: 3

Evidence facilitate criminal forensic investigation. Many countries have multiple fingerprint databases, with each database serving a specific purpose. In Malaysia, there are at least 4 different fingerprint databases; namely PDRM-MAFIS (Polis Di Raja Malaysia- Malaysian Automated Fingerprint Identification System), PDRM-BIOFIS (Polis Di Raja Malaysia-Biometric Identification System), NRD-AFIS (National Registration Department- Automated Fingerprint Identification System), and NERS (National Foreigners Enforcement and Registration System).[1] The consolidation of fingerprint databases will enable cross-referencing to be done easily. For instance, the PDRM-BIOFIS fingerprint database contains the fingerprints of criminals. These criminals are often under travel restriction, and upon cross-referencing with the NERS fingerprint database will allow easy refusal of entry and exit at immigration points. Identification of fingerprint is often useful and regularly resorted to when necessary. In the case of PP v. Toh Kee Huat[2] , Ong J acquitted the accused at the close of the prosecution because the only evidence against the accused was his fingerprint and the ‘accused’s fingerprint’, among other unidentified ones on the window of the car, which was left standing in a place accessible to anyone, cannot be legally sufficient to infer his guilty. “With respect, I do not understand what is meant by, legally sufficient’. At any rate, the weight of evidence of finger......

Words: 9471 - Pages: 38


...HPNA Position Statement Evidence-Based Practice Background Increased attention is being directed toward the development of methods that can provide valid and reliable information about what works best in healthcare. The careful scientific evaluation of clinical practice became a prominent focus during the second half of the 20th century.1 More recently, attention has been paid to methods of determining which of multiple proven approaches to a healthcare problem works best for which patients.2 Evidence-based practice encompasses implementing the best-known practices into the clinical setting using a scientific approach. It evolved from evidence-based medicine, which was developed in Canada to teach medical students. “Evidence-based medicine has been defined as the conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients.”3, p. 3 The National Quality Forum’s report A National Framework and Preferred Practices for Palliative and Hospice Care Quality is a consensus report that is a first step toward introducing evidence-based measures into palliative practice on a formal, national level.4 The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) supports organizations in their efforts to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare by facilitating the use of evidence-based research findings in clinical practice.5 The nursing discipline has also embraced evidence-based practice over the past 25 years, initially......

Words: 1545 - Pages: 7


...The Levels of Criminal Justice Get Involved in Law Enforcement Your experience at South University will be richer and more memorable if you get involved in there Law Enforcement Career. You will have an opportunity to meet other students, faculty, and staff members and will participate in Law Enforcement activities that will make your learning experience more valuable to you and your college experience. Consider becoming involved in Law Enforcement. You might take part in activities such as these: * Get to watch an autopsy * Get to see what the jail or prison looks like * Get to volunteer in the community to help the police * Get to choose which areas you would like to work * Help make the community better Police Officers As a police officer, you are eligible to attend meetings of the Sergeants to see what needs to be done in the community. At the meeting, you will have the opportunities to learn about what is new in the community and try to better at the same time. At the conclusion of the meeting, the Sergeants invite the officer to voice their own opinions. Eventually, you might decide to run for the Sergeants position. Police officers are to follow these steps: * Enforce the Law * Investigate Crimes * Apprehend Offenders * Reduce and Prevent Crimes * Maintain Public Order * Ensure community safety * Provide emergency and related community services * Protect the Fundamental rights and freedoms of......

Words: 459 - Pages: 2

Forensic Evidence in It

...U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice APR. 04 Special REPORT Forensic Examination of Digital Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street N.W. Washington, DC 20531 John Ashcroft Attorney General Deborah J. Daniels Assistant Attorney General Sarah V. Hart Director, National Institute of Justice This and other publications and products of the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice can be found on the World Wide Web at the following site: Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice APR. 04 Forensic Examination of Digital Evidence: A Guide for Law Enforcement NCJ 199408 Sarah V. Hart Director This document is not intended to create, does not create, and may not be relied upon to create any rights, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by any party in any matter civil or criminal. Opinions or points of view expressed in this document represent a consensus of the authors and do not represent the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. The products, manufacturers, and organizations discussed in this document are presented for informational purposes only and do not constitute product approval or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Justice. This document was prepared under Interagency Agreement #1999–IJ–R–094......

Words: 22743 - Pages: 91

Spy Sweeper 5 8 1 | HarmonQuest | Brendan Cowell