Analysis of the Organizational Structure of Perdue Farms

In: Business and Management

Submitted By msmith2591
Words 1943
Pages 8
ANALYSIS OF THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE OF PERDUE FARMS INC.

Analysis of the Organizational Structure of Perdue Farms Inc.
Ashton Smith
MGMT 630 1121
February 23, 2014

My reason for constructing this analysis is to measure the organizational structure of the Perdue Company by using the Marcic Dimension Scale. This scale evaluates organizations by various categories that help develop a better understanding of how complex an organization might be. The categories I have chosen to assess Perdue include specialization, technology, culture, goals, and size. These dimension factors along with others allow managers to understand exactly how a company operates.
Specialization
The term specialization is defined as “the degree to which organizational tasks are subdivided into separate jobs” (Daft, 2010). Perdue Farms has divided its tasks by choosing vertical integration to manage every detail. “As a vertically integrated agribusiness, the company is able to ensure quality at every step in the supply chain” (Perdue Inc., 2008).
It breeds and hatches its own eggs (19 hatcheries), selects its contract growers, builds Perdue-engineered chicken houses, formulates and manufactures its own feed (12 poultry feedmills, 1 specialty feedmill, 2 ingredient blending operations), oversees the care and feeding of the chicks, operates its own processing plants (21 processing and further processing plants), distributes via its own trucking fleet, and markets the production. (Daft, 2010, pp. 629-630)
Responsibilities at Perdue are dispersed throughout all of its departments to make sure production is executed the proper way. Perdue’s breeder operations, hatcheries, farming, processing and distribution all play a valid role in the importance of the company. According to the Marcic scale, I would rate Perdue Farms a one. It is very clear that every aspect of this organization…...

Similar Documents

Analysis of Organizational Structure and Culture – the Apple Corporation

...enjoy a higher-than-average pay rate, are able to be test subjects for new products and software, and they have even said that they feel like their work has an impact on the entire world. They say that Apple feels more like a start-up company than a large corporation, and they actually like their leadership! They have also said that pay and benefits are better than elsewhere, and that having Apple on their resume helps with other jobs later in life should they choose to move on (Business Insider, 2012). With such a high rate of employee satisfaction, business policies that focus on respect and courtesy, as well as the open-forum of communication within the company, I believe Apple to be an almost perfect example of how a company’s structure and communication can work to its benefit. Apple seems like a fun, inspiring and well-respected place to work, and the company’s leadership seems focused on the right things in order to continue moving Apple forward in the future. References Apple Corporation. (2012). “Investor Relations - Governance”. Retrieved November 17, 2012 from http://investor.apple.com/governance.cfm Apple Corporation. (2012). “Business Conduct”. Retrieved November 17, 2012 from http://files.shareholder.com/downloads/AAPL/2175130091x0x443008/5f38b1e6-2f9c-4518-b691-13a29ac90501/business_conduct_policy.pdf Apple Corporation. (2012). “Apple and the Environment”. Retrieved November 17, 2012 from http://www.apple.com/environment/ Business Insider. (2012).......

Words: 618 - Pages: 3

Organizational Structures

...What is Organizational Development? Organizational Development An organization includes any situation in which two or more persons are involved in a common pursuit or objective. Based on this informal definition then we would like to start our discussion with an assumption that organizations, just like human beings, have cycles of development, each characterized by its specific problems, crises and ways to overcome them. In essence then, Organizational Development is a planned system of change in pursuit of the organization staying relevant to the evolving stakeholder’s needs and environment of operation. Organizational Development is the future readiness of an organization to meet change and a thus a systemic learning and development strategy intended to change the basics of beliefs, attitudes and relevance of values, and structure of the current organization to better absorb disruptive technologies, shrinking or exploding market opportunities and ensuing challenges and chaos. Organizational Development deals with improving a company’s performance and individual development of its employees. Organization development is an ongoing, systematic process of implementing effective organizational change. Organization development is known as both a field of applied behavioral science focused on understanding and managing organizational change and as a field of scientific study and inquiry. It is interdisciplinary in nature and draws on sociology, psychology, and theories of...

Words: 1584 - Pages: 7

Organizational Structure

...Strategy Process 10 Organizational Structure and Control Prof. Dr. Bernd Venohr Berlin, June 2007 © 2007 Prof. Dr. Bernd Venohr Agenda Introduction to Strategy 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Course Overview and Strategy Concept Economics of Strategy Shareholder Value External Environment Internal Environment Competitive Positioning Diversification Mergers & Acquisitions Global Strategy Business Strategy Corporate Strategy Strategy Process 10 Organizational Structure and Control 11 Strategic Leadership © 2007 Prof. Dr. Bernd Venohr 2 Overview  “Structure follows strategy“  Basics of structuring organizations  Example: managing the multibusiness organization © 2007 Prof. Dr. Bernd Venohr 3 Alfred Chandler: Structure follows strategy  Alfred Chandler (business history professor at Harvard Business School) examined in Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise (1962) the organizational changes of several large US companies: Organization developed in response to changes in the corporation's business strategy  An organization begins with a single product or line of business. Over time the organization begins to grow in size and complexity (more products ). Ultimately the structure of the organization has to change from functional to divisional organization as a result of the strategy change: „unless structure follows strategy, inefficiency results“  This research has been a source of controversial discussion...

Words: 3349 - Pages: 14

Organizational Structure

...Introduction of Organizational structure 1.1.1 Background of Organizational structure The environment is dynamic and is changing day by day. Organization set up in such dynamic environment needs to adapt and survive in such hostile conditions to achieve the organizational goals and objective. Organizational structures developed from the ancient times of hunters and collectors in tribal organizations through highly royal and clerical power structures to industrial structures and today's post-industrial structures. As pointed out by L. B. Mohr, the early theorists of organizational structure, Taylor, Fayol, and Weber "saw the importance of structure for effectiveness and efficiency and assumed without the slightest question that whatever structure was needed, people could fashion accordingly”. Organizational structure was considered a matter of choice. When in the 1930s, the rebellion began that came to be known as human relations theory, there was still not a denial of the idea of structure as an artefact, but rather an advocacy of the creation of a different sort of structure, one in which the needs, knowledge, and opinions of employees might be given greater recognition." However, a different view arose in the 1960s, suggesting that the organizational structure is "an externally caused phenomenon, an outcome rather than an artefact." In the 21st century, organizational theorists such as Lim, Griffiths, and Sambrook (2010) are once again proposing that organizational......

Words: 2272 - Pages: 10

Analysis of Organizational Structure

...Letter of Transmittal May 12, 2014 Mrs Sutapa Bhattacharjee Assistant Professor Institute of Business Administration University of Dhaka Dear Madam, We, the students of Group 1 of Section – B, BBA 22nd Batch, have prepared this report on “Analysis of Grameen Phone’s Organizational Structure” which you had assigned to us as a part of the completion of the course “ Principles of Management”, Course Code: W201. We have studied on the organizational structure of Grameenphone based on what we have understood through the theoretical concepts mentioned in our books and also face-to-face interview of Mr. Monwar Hossain, Senior Specialist, Centre of Expertise, People and Organization, Grameenphone. This was one of our most important experiences as we have learnt and mastered concepts that we have never dreamt of. Hopefully these experiences and concepts will help us in the corporate world awaiting us. We thank you for your moral support and help in this regard. Please note that this report has been prepared under your supervision. Under no circumstances will this report be produced for any other BBA (IBA) course ever. No part of this report will be shared or republished without your authorization. Sincerely yours, Mithi Chowdhury (RH – 60) Tahmid Md. Iqbal (ZR – 64) Md Omer Faruk Chy (ZR – 73) Tanjila Najnin (RH – 85) Masroor Faiyaz Moqsum (ZR – 90) Table of Contents: 1. Executive Summary...................................................................

Words: 2740 - Pages: 11

Organizational Structure Analysis

...Organizational Structure Analysis Adam Alderson, Angeles Roman, Kristopher Hilton, Chad Hulsey MGT 230 June 16, 2014 Eve Morse Organizational Structure Analysis There are three different organizational structures that a business can use. There is Functional Structure, which has each portion of the organization grouped according to purpose. There is Divisional Structure, which divides the organization by geographic area or types of product or market. There is also Matrix Structure, which uses both functional and product departments but also has workers from these departments reporting to a project manager. Each of these structure types has their advantages and drawbacks and we will discuss those. First, we will look at the Functional Structure. The Functional Structure has a single manager to oversee the work being done. This type also allows for many workers in the same field to collaborate and become very cohesive as a team where advancement is there for everyone. The downside to a Functional Structure is two fold. One problem is that different departments can argue over what falls under their umbrella of responsibilities. Another problem is that larger companies will have larger employee groups, which makes managing them become more difficult. Second, we examine the Divisional Structure. The Divisional Structure groups basic tasks into jobs and then groups those jobs into departments. This creates departments based on the final outcome of each job group. An......

Words: 435 - Pages: 2

Organizational Structure

...Organizational Structure Analysis MGT/230 06/30/2014 Structure Analysis An important trait to any organization in the business world of today is the functions within the organization. Overall, an organizing function of management outlines the practice in which individuals within the organization interact and work with each other. In this paper the discussion will be focused on the pros and cons of the three major horizontal structure types; Functional, Divisional, Matrix. The Pros Commonly found in organizations are the pros of the horizontal structures. Functional Structure has its advantages because it saves the bottom line, and that is cost. Employee performance is better maintained, the line of communication is more precise and clearly elaborated. The advantage of the Divisional Organizations is that less information is required and employees receive broader training. All task responsibilities tend to be clearer with the Divisional Organization. The advantage of the Matrix Organization is that extensive communication helps others process larger amounts of information. Decision making is given to others and when its processes accordingly, it is then applied through trainings. The Disadvantages The disadvantage of the Functional Structure is the employee caring more about the revenue than the customer or the product...

Words: 705 - Pages: 3

Organizational Structure

...Organizational Structure Paper Mayfield G. Parker MGT/230 May 24, 2012 Organizational Structure Paper The organizational structure of the Cheesecake Factory demonstrates how organizational function, and organizational design can lead to having a successful franchise. “The company operates 150 upscale casual dining restaurants under the “Cheesecake Factory “brand“ (Datamonitor, 2011). The company utilizes point of sale cash register system to maintain financial and accounting controls in restaurants (Datamonitor, 2011). The company is known for the variety of flavors in cheesecakes, and also offers a wide selection of food to choose from in their daily menu’s. Structure The Cheesecake factory utilizes Hierarchal structure comprised of 11 executives in all. The company has a CEO, 6 Directors, a Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Legal & Secretary, and Bakery (The Official Board.Com). Steak n Shake utilizes a Hierarchal structure also comprised of 6 executives, which is the CEO, Vice Chairman of the board, 2 directors, Vice President and Control (The Official Board.Com). Burger King has 22 executives comprised of a CEO, 8 directors, a Chief Financial Officer(CFO), Human Resources, Operations, Legal& Secretary,Communications & Culture, Asia Pacific, EMEA, Latin America, North America, Chief Information Officer(CIO), Product marketing, Investor Relations & Global Communications, Operations, North America Operations (The Official......

Words: 725 - Pages: 3

Analysis of Organizational Structure and Culture – the Apple Corporation

...Analysis of Organizational Structure and Culture – the Apple Corporation Apple Corporation is governed by a Board of Directors, a CEO and a standard Executive Board. Their Board of Directors includes such names as former Vice-President Al Gore, Chairman of the Walt Disney Company, Robert Iger, and Andrea Jung, Chairman of the Avon Corporation. Tim Cook took over CEO duties following the passing of Apple founder, Steve Jobs, last year. I studied both their Business Conduct documents and articles on employee satisfaction for this assignment (Apple, 2012). What immediately struck me were their basic principles of how they conduct their business. They are very focused on creating high-quality products and services and have four basic standards: * Honesty – demonstrate honesty and high ethical standards in all business dealings. * Respect – treat customers, suppliers, employees, and others with respect and courtesy. * Confidentiality – protect the confidentiality of Apple’s information and the information of our customers, suppliers and employees. * Compliance – ensure that business decisions comply with all applicable laws and regulations. (Apple, 2012). Second was the “Retaliation is Not Tolerated” policy, which states “Apple will not retaliate, and will not tolerate retaliation, against any individual for filing a good-faith complaint with management, HR, Legal, Internal Audit, Finance, or the Business Conduct Helpline, or for participating in the...

Words: 297 - Pages: 2

Organizational Structure Analysis

...Organizational Structure Analysis After discussing with Team A, we were impressed by John Whybrow’s video and his experience from switching from a functional organization to a line of business. The changes that his company was faced with were very exciting, better communication, better results, and impressive behaviors. The first functional organization that was discussed in the video was the line of business organization. This was the top to bottom structure that had all employees, divisions, and leadership in the same communication ladder. The second was functional organization. In this type, the business is split up by certain aspects of a given task. It could be departmental, or just a product or idea that the team is working on. The biggest problem with this is that upper management would need to take more time to see what the bottom line was, or what the issue is with the business. All other business functions would be only looking at what is seen within the division. For the line of business function, there would be many different managers looking from the top down for financial analysis. There a four types of horizontal structure organizations. They are functional, divisional, matrix, and network. They each have their own unique way to structure a business, and each have pros and cons to them. This first type is the functional organization. An advantage of a functional organizational structure is that it offers a high level of specialization. Each unit operates...

Words: 732 - Pages: 3

Organizational Structure

...Organizational Structure HCS/325 Jeffery Dodd April 7, 2015 Presentation Outline Long-term Care Services Expansion Introduction: I. The Impact of Organizational Structure on Communication (internal/external factors) What internal factors need to be considered? 1. Strengths 2. Weaknesses What external factors need to be considered? 1. Opportunities 2. Threats What is the importance of communication on the organizational structure? 1. Planning and Decision Making 2. Five-step Process The steps involved in organizational planning and functions of management Steps used to properly plan and implement change within the organization Steps in organizational planning are: 1) Identify and define the problem 2) Generate and evaluate possible course of actions 3) Choose a preferred solution 4) Implement the solution 5) Evaluate results Functions of Managements are: 1) Planning 2) Organizing 3) Leading 4) Controlling Steps of organizational planning and functions of management could be applied in the scenario and would be of a lot of help too. It can help in the scenario because there would be implementing a new long term care service and with the new expansion we will need to hire and train several new employees. I would use the steps of organizational planning for analyzing the pros and cons of bringing a new long term care to the facility. The pros would be that we would have a new additional long term care we would have more patients. The cons......

Words: 399 - Pages: 2

Organizational Structure

... Organizational Structure Melissa Moran XMGT/230 July 5, 2015 Carol Dimopoulos The organizational structure that I choose is when I worked at Popeye’s Louisiana fried chicken. They had very strict set guidelines to follow and the outline of the structure was very obvious. Had the executive, managers, shift leads, employees and rookies. If any issues came up you had to talk to the manager or if the manager had issues with you they came and told you. Was very tense environment and didn’t seem like an employee or rookie could speak their minds. Now this structure compared to say a school environment and a dairy farm environment would be good to compare and contrast. Within a school environment everyone is treated the same with respect and everyone listens to each other and if someone has an idea to make the system run better they are open to it. Just because there is a high power (principle) doesn’t mean his way is the only way. He just is the deciding factor on whether it is going to be the right thing for the school or something that will harm the school too much. With working for the Dairy they are little in and out it seems on their organizations structure. With a dairy farm it is broken down from bosses to managers to shift leads and employees but there is little to no room for advancement within the company once an employee always an employee no matter the length of time that have worked for the company. That probably is the thing that stands out the most from Popeye’s,...

Words: 1007 - Pages: 5

Case for Analysis - Perdue Farms Inc.

...Case for Analysis: Perdue Farms Inc. Responding to the 21st Century Challenges 1. Describe the change in management style at Perdue Farms. By all accounts, Frank Perdue was a workaholic. He was a true entrepreneur. With little education, he started his own company, worked long hours, made many single handed decisions and grew the company. He was a traditional leader and used a centralized management style and kept decision making authority in his own hands. Initially, employees were expected to just do their jobs and it was not until later years that Frank encouraged employee participation in quality and operational decisions. While Jim Perdue also has the entrepreneurial spirit, he is highly educated and has the temperament to move the company into a different type of management style. He believes in the importance of the work force and adopts a people first management style. He, like his father, believed the success of the business relies on providing quality products. But Jim believes the workers, or associates as they are called, play an integral role in that process. He believes the associates are the ones that strive to assure the quality of the product and therefore the satisfaction of the customers. Jim implemented many employee benefit programs in an effort increase associate satisfaction. His idea was to maximize company productivity by using the ideas and information provided by everyone in the organization. The management style at Perdue gradually......

Words: 667 - Pages: 3

Organizational Structure

...Organizational structure is a type of framework used in businesses. Its purpose is to find the most effective way to delegate roles, power, and responsibilities to its employees and departments. It also controls and coordinates how information flows between different departments and levels of management in an organization. Having a proper organizational structure will allow a company to implement better operating procedures, and dictate which employees help in making decisions or shaping the organization. Based on an organizations goals and objectives it may be structured in many different ways. Two important structures include Mechanistic and Organic structures.   Mechanistic structures are mainly for companies that operate in a stable environment, use a centralized approach of authority, and maintain strong loyalty for management. Organizations that use a Mechanistic type of structure generally do not need to change or adapt their structure. This is mainly due to lack of innovation, creativity, and quick decision analysis not needed. Examples of organizations using Mechanistic structures include colleges and universities. If you think about it, they have long and strict registration procedures, rarely have to adapt or change in order to keep students enrolling, and most students tend to maintain high loyalty or obedience toward their instructors.   Mechanistic Structures Include: –          Belief upper management is better capable of making decisions –         ......

Words: 377 - Pages: 2

Organizational Structure

...October 31 , 2011 Vivian Perez Presentation Outline Long-term Care Services Expansion Introduction/Thesis: I. The Impact of Organizational Structure on Communication (internal/external factors) A. What internal factors need to be considered? 1. Strengths 2. Weaknesses B. What external factors need to be considered? 1. Opportunities 2. Threats C. What is the importance of communication on the organizational structure? 1. Planning and Decision Making 2. Five-step Process II. The steps involved in organizational planning and functions of management A. Steps used to properly plan and implement change within the organization I. Steps in organizational planning are: 1) Identify and define the problem 2) Generate and evaluate possible course of actions 3) Choose a preferred solution 4) Implement the solution 5) Evaluate results II. Functions of Managements are: 1) Planning 2) Organizing 3) Leading 4) Controlling B. Steps of organizational planning and functions of management could be applied in the scenario and would be of a lot of help too. It can help in the scenario because there would be implementing a new long term care service and with the new expansion we will need to hire and train several new employees. I would use the steps of organizational planning for analyzing the pros and cons of bringing a new long term care to the facility. The pros would be that we would......

Words: 463 - Pages: 2

American Woman (2018 - ongoing) RATING 6.1 / 10 QUALITY | Colección de Minerales en bruto de 50 piezas en cartón grande | FormatFactory